Do you think men are more effeminate?

No, no, no, I'm not looking for a man. I'm not talking about the facade of "manly men". It seems the more effiminate natures and accepting aberrant and deviant behaviors are being stuffed down our thoats. If we choose not to accept them, (Don M .mentioned the Oscars) it seems we are the ones who are attacked for not approving. Maybe it is that the new generations have a softer life. Heck, I don't know! I still want to time travel back to 1959! Thanks guys! You guys are awesome!
I don't think we've welcomed you to the forum yet Gaer (if so, I missed it) - I hope you enjoy your time here.
peacelove.jpg
 

This is an exceptional post Rosemarie.
An opinion very well stated.
It may be that men are now allowed to show their true natures. In the past, some of the fashions for men have been very feminine. Think of the cavaliers with their lace and frills, Regency days with their 'fops and dandys'. During the sixties 'Teddy boys' were always fussing over their appearance, so it's nothing new.
The differences between the genders are not well-defined. What bothers me is how many men think it's macho to be violent, as though men who are kind and sensitive are somehow less masculine.


If all men are expected to be / wanted to be kind and sensitive ?.....The next time we get into a boots on the ground / face to face to war .......we are going to lose.

It takes a hard man to win such wars.
 
And that explains the stable rate of homosexuality throughout millennia how?
I never said it did. I say it COULD have something to do with how all the little connections were made to make a person what it is at birth. Nothing more. No one knows how drinking a bottle of water loaded with BPA on a day when a particular connection is being made affects the fetus. Hormones are powerful things whether they are natural or man made.
 

iu
 
Gardenlover: Thank you so much for welcoming me. That was so kind! Don't know if I will continue. I'm not used to posting online and my first thread is a complete flop!
Win231: Maybe you shouldn't do your eye makeup before bed. It messes up the pillowslips and you don't look so pretty in the morning. But, Don't forget to paint your toenails!
 
If all men are expected to be / wanted to be kind and sensitive ?.....The next time we get into a boots on the ground / face to face to war .......we are going to lose.

It takes a hard man to win such wars.
She didn’t say men need be kind and sensitive 24/7!

I think men have been conditioned their entire lives to be the tougher gender. Showing signs of tenderness appears to have been deemed as a weakness of characteristic somehow or a trait of homosexuality, sending mixed messages to young men.

I tend to agree with Rosemarie when she states that many men seem to think that toughness is a masculine trait but most men were raised to be tough.

Most manly sports are tough. Commercials glamorize tough manly men and women are supposed to adore these types. There’s a huge disconnect there.

As a women I think we like to believe that our man can protect us in case it’s ever needed . That doesn’t mean we want a violent brute as a lifetime companion. We require tenderness as much as you do.
 
Gardenlover: Thank you so much for welcoming me. That was so kind! Don't know if I will continue. I'm not used to posting online and my first thread is a complete flop!
Win231: Maybe you shouldn't do your eye makeup before bed. It messes up the pillowslips and you don't look so pretty in the morning. But, Don't forget to paint your toenails!

Oh don’t go.
Most of my threads are a complete flop too but I’m still here. STAY. You won’t find a nicer group of old folks as US. 🥳
 
No, Selleck is a sell-out moth@#fu#$&% who hawks rip-off reverse mortgages on TV, all the time talking about how he personally checked out the options with such mortgages!

This a-hole is worth around $45M. He NEVER checked out reverse mortgages other than to see how many millions he'd make hawking the company's dreck! Disgusting!

(FWIW: I know, in a very, very small percentage of cases, that a reverse mortgage can be a good idea. Thing is, I've read far more sad stories concerning them, than happy ones.)

Now, Sophia Loren----- Oh baby!
Well, so what? Henry Winkler also hawked reverse mortgages. Dr. Oz hawked green coffee. They'll hawk anything if they're paid enough - and they are.
 
Last edited:
Well, so what? Henry Winkler also hawked revere mortgages. Dr. Oz hawked green coffee. They'll hawk anything if they're paid enough - and they are.
Maybe it's just me, but when I see a well known celebrity being paid for commercials, it always smacks of desperation, like they're short of money and can't get enough doing their line of work. William Shatner is another one making commercials. Selleck has the TV cop show, isn't his income enough? Reverse mortgages are good for the insurance companies most of the time, except for when the insured lives too long past their anticipated demise (very few of them do).
 
Maybe *I* am thinking your ultra-extreme reactionary and prejudiced views are being stuffed down my THOAT. And maybe I'm not. And maybe it is you who are used to attacking and judging others and want the freedom to continue to do so. Not awesome, no longer acceptable by a kinder, gentler society. Maybe.

Few minutes online shows our society is not very kind and gentle. It's more like a ticking time bomb.
 
Don't know if I will continue. I'm not used to posting online and my first thread is a complete flop!
No it is not a flop, and you certainly are not. Read your profile and you list Goethe as a favorite read. That is fascinating. You appear to be a very interesting, varied person. I hope you stay. I sincerely hope you do.
 
Don't know if I will continue. I'm not used to posting online and my first thread is a complete flop!
Welcome to SF, Gaer. :)
I don't know why, but this is a controversial topic and rarely goes well...like politics and religions. As soon as this thread was created, some members suggested closing it. But on the other hand, we just had a discussion about closing threads, we don't want to close too many threads. Besides, closing a new member's thread may send you the wrong message. :D We are between a rock and a hard place all the time. :rolleyes:
 
Welcome to SF, Gaer. :)
I don't know why, but this is a controversial topic and rarely goes well...like politics and religions. ...

I think it's because people generalize that "x" appearance or lifestyle follows "x" ideological paths or prejudices. Hasn't been what I've observed in real life. Friends with alternative lifestyles prove this so wrong. People aren't cookie cuttered. My best guy friend (platonic) of 20+ years is very slightly bi/mostly gay and will quickly agree that millennial men are too soft. And though he isn't effeminate, isn't at all attracted to effeminate, he has good friends that are.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's just me, but when I see a well known celebrity being paid for commercials, it always smacks of desperation, like they're short of money and can't get enough doing their line of work. William Shatner is another one making commercials. Selleck has the TV cop show, isn't his income enough? Reverse mortgages are good for the insurance companies most of the time, except for when the insured lives too long past their anticipated demise (very few of them do).
It couldn't be desperation for money - the celebrities who do the ads are among the most wealthy. The residuals & royalties from re-runs, alone would shock most people if they knew.
Just one example I know of, because it was publicized because of the judgments against him: O.J. Simpson's football pension (which is 100% immune from any judgments) is $24,000.00 per month - tax free. And he continued to get it while in prison & still gets it now. Probably the same or more for other celebrities.
They're just so highly paid for a little work, so why not?
 
Plus, who says times have changed that much.
People were more repressed because they had to be or might get burned to a stake in the older days.
True sexual expression was prohibited and there were dire consequences for not following suite.
We ‘think’ there was less homosexuality but we don’t know. People were more discrete and there was no Facebook. Boys seemed forced into masculine roles years ago. Plus there were wars going on so the world needed tough men.

I don’t think men are becoming more feminine and women more masculine. Before the advancement modern technology , men and women had more specific roles. Men went out into the workforce and made a living to provide for the family. Women stayed home to nurture and raise the children. She’d learn all the domesticated things that needed doing. At the time, this is all we knew.

Now that women have come into the work force, it’s thrown off the family dynamics somewhat. Men generally ruled the household years back but now most women do. Now most women know how to do more than domesticated duties so it has thrown the balance off some.

Boys are learning that it’s ok to play with dolls or like dancing. It’s ok to like all colours. They are learning that it’s ok to cry and show emotion. Males have strong emotions that they may have felt like they had to bottle up or suppress before. Now they are encouraged to feel every human emotion fully.

I’ve had several gay friends both male and female and most people seem to like to stereotype them and then fear them. I think most people don’t understand how the diversity in sexuality can exist within a civil society. They can’t wrap their head around it. Then again, humanity has always had hang ups about the topic of sexuality and it’s certainly a factor in this thread topic.
 
I don't know if there's any fans here of ''Cheyenne'' (Clint Walker). The character was my idea of the perfect man, he was rough when he needed to be but was gentle in his ways and very ethical and honest and had a lot of common sense (besides being tall and gorgeous). Wish I had met someone like him but it was not in my fate.
That's my kind of man, too. Men who are kind and sensitive can be just as tough as the brutes when the occasion demands it.
 
She didn’t say men need be kind and sensitive 24/7!

I think men have been conditioned their entire lives to be the tougher gender. Showing signs of tenderness appears to have been deemed as a weakness of characteristic somehow or a trait of homosexuality, sending mixed messages to young men.

I tend to agree with Rosemarie when she states that many men seem to think that toughness is a masculine trait but most men were raised to be tough.

Most manly sports are tough. Commercials glamorize tough manly men and women are supposed to adore these types. There’s a huge disconnect there.

As a women I think we like to believe that our man can protect us in case it’s ever needed . That doesn’t mean we want a violent brute as a lifetime companion. We require tenderness as much as you do.


"She didn’t say men need be kind and sensitive 24/7! "

I do not believe it is easily turned on or off ! A man,[heck anybody] is what he is [they are] mostly by nature . Yeah sure a person can have temper "flares" but IMO, that is temporary. Again opinion but....I also believe that is why combat soldiers sometimes have a hard time [dialing it back] . They live as an aggressor for 1-2 however many years......and being praised for doing so......then suddenly they are expected to behave in an entirely different manner.

As I said, it takes a hard man [men] to win a boots on the ground/face to face war..........jmo.
 

Back
Top