My question to you, Gaer, isn't are you accepting of these ways, but rather are you accepting that the other person has a right to these beliefs?
As long as we're speaking freely:
I have a problem with the rhetoric that the teaching of Critical Race Theory is the teaching of Caucasians to be ashamed of being White. I'm a White woman in my 70's -- just so that there's no misunderstanding of my motivations in saying this. Critical Race Theory is the teaching of history, economics, etc. with the
inclusion of how race impacted and was impacted by that history, economics, etc. in addition to the inclusion of all sorts of other things.
"
critical race theory (CRT),
intellectual movement and loosely organized framework of legal analysis based on the
premise that
race is not a natural, biologically grounded feature of physically distinct subgroups of human beings but a socially constructed (culturally invented) category that is used to oppress and exploit people of colour. Critical race theorists hold that the law and legal institutions in the United States are inherently
racist insofar as they function to create and maintain social, economic, and political inequalities between whites and nonwhites, especially
African Americans."
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory
Social scientists have held for a long time, and the Human Genome Project now validates, that race is a social construct. If we want to understand the present, we really need to know the full, not just a part of, history. For instance, there's a reason the Interstate highways were built where they were, but we White folks were never taught about it. I mention this one because it isn't something most people think about, but it was done with race in mind.