Gay wedding cake Supreme Court case

Ever see a sign as we have here in the US ....... businesses reserve the right to refuse service to anyone...
there are other reasons any customer who has unrealistic expectations or demands ...... plenty of bridezillas types. people who call and make "changes" several times etc.....who want to pay lets make a deal with negotiated price etc.
There are nightmare customers in every business ............
but NOW if a place say sorry we cannot accommodate this request they are instantly labeled. that is to me .......extortion "do what i want or we will shame you or sue you telling everyone you are homophobic"
how is that all cool to do?
I’ve never seen a sign saying business reserves the right to refuse services to anyone but I CAN certainly understand the need to have such a sign. I was a bridesmaid to a bridezilla so ‘check.’


And I can certainly understand the extortion idea. It probably happens often. That’s definitely NOT ok to do.

Fair enough and good answers. 👍
I can definitely see your points of view.
 

Could the sign be legally used in the way @Jeni suggests? "to kick out people whom are on drugs/ creating a diversion for theft ..... and generalized other bad customers." I'd hope so.
Absolutely. I have seen such notices myself pre and post entry to a business. Absolutely legal. It is merely a notice of conduct. Being disorderly then asked to leave in lieu of a trespassing charge. Of course any person can claim the reason is anti - PA laws, they asked me to leave because I was black or Christian, etc. How about they were causing a business disturbance, etc.?
 

I wish that were the case... then we wouldn't need laws and court cases like this one. If it were my bakery I would only discriminate against those who couldn't pay...

However I suppose I'd draw the line at the KKK cake...
I'm with you. I think if someone goes into business to serve the public and benefit financially from it, they should do just that......serve the public and don't discriminate against any customers due to their race, ethnicity, religion or gender.

The comparison made to a KKK cake is apples and oranges. A gay couple wanting a cake for their wedding ceremony is a positive thing, and doesn't harm anyone.

A KKK member who is extremely hateful, racist and would want to kill/hang people of color should not be served. Anyone wanting something violent, vulgar or obscene put on their cake should be denied also.

Only signs I ever noticed were, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
 
We have “Love is Love” on a rainbow flag on many, if not most, stores in town. The size is about 8” square usually. It’s just a quiet, positive message. They would get my business.
They would absolutely get my business too. There are several homes in my area that have the larger sign which includes other sayings, either on their lawn or inside of their front window. We need much more of that IMO, more love and tolerance....less hate. We are all people, all feel pain when injured, all have joys or problems which affect our emotional and mental health, and we all bleed red. Respect and equality is a good thing.
 
I'm with you. I think if someone goes into business to serve the public and benefit financially from it, they should do just that......serve the public and don't discriminate against any customers due to their race, ethnicity, religion or gender.

The comparison made to a KKK cake is apples and oranges. A gay couple wanting a cake for their wedding ceremony is a positive thing, and doesn't harm anyone.

A KKK member who is extremely hateful, racist and would want to kill/hang people of color should not be served. Anyone wanting something violent, vulgar or obscene put on their cake should be denied also.
These were my exact thoughts right from the start.

The only restriction I can understand from a business is if you were trying to hire a private stripper for a 13 year old. Making a cake is completely different. Adding these types of preferences, is adding personal politics that shouldn’t even apply.

If it’s considered for ‘religious’ reasons, where do you draw the line? Do you refuse to serve a couple if it’s a second marriage?
Do you refuse to serve them if it’s a mixed race marriage?

I thought the same thing about the KKK comparison. There is no comparison between these two. Ones a hateful group and the others a homosexual couple wishing to celebrate a wedding. There’s are two extremes!
 
I'm with you. I think if someone goes into business to serve the public and benefit financially from it, they should do just that......serve the public and don't discriminate against any customers due to their race, ethnicity, religion or gender.

The comparison made to a KKK cake is apples and oranges. A gay couple wanting a cake for their wedding ceremony is a positive thing, and doesn't harm anyone.

A KKK member who is extremely hateful, racist and would want to kill/hang people of color should not be served. Anyone wanting something violent, vulgar or obscene put on their cake should be denied also.

Only signs I ever noticed were, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
Who is going to decide which person is extremely hateful and which people are full of love and positivity? I saw a a man I worked with bring in a cake that I would describe as vulgar, but he thought it was funny and was wanting to make his friends laugh out of his love for them.

Remember the Starbucks incident where a young woman refused to give the restroom key to two men who hadn't bought anything? The whole world hated that woman because the men were black and she had called the police to remove them. She was immediately fired by Starbucks. Just recently she won a huge lawsuit against them, because she had just been following the rules she had been taught and the men were on video being belligerent and offensive to the her and others. There are gray areas in all these cases.

I hope the next time I go to the store the clerk isn't going to refuse to sell me anything because he thinks I'm not positive enough. What if he finds out I'm a Christian and in keeping with his prejudicial stereotyping decides I must be hateful so he can deny me service?
Straight white people already know that if they're assaulted in the streets, the perpetrator wont be punished as harshly as they would if they had assaulted some member of any other group. We need to decide once and for all if we believe in equality or not. Either business owners can refuse service to anyone they want to or to no one at all.
 
Last edited:
Correction .... yes it did. The first gender reassignment surgery didn't happen in the U.S. until 1950, so it did work for almost 200 years. Perhaps there were a few who felt out of place, but it did work.
As for ones who were given inaccurate gender assignments at birth, I'm not quite sure what that means (Wrong documentation, nearsighted doctor, ???)
I am not arguing that we shouldn't have change. As I said, those who won't change and adapt are like the dinosaurs. But it does get very confusing because there are no clear guidelines anymore. What bathroom does a crossdresser go into. I don't know. Personally I don't really care, but some might.
Seems to me if you have a *****, go to the men's room. if you don't go to the ladies room. If you have both then how do you dress? Go to the appropriate facility.
This isn't all that complicated.
 
If it’s considered for ‘religious’ reasons, where do you draw the line? Do you refuse to serve a couple if it’s a second marriage?
Do you refuse to serve them if it’s a mixed race marriage?
....or refuse them if they are Jewish, Muslim, Atheist, Agnostic, etc. Religion should be kept out of business dealings, if you are intolerant and hateful, you need to rethink your 'religious' values and take a good look in the mirror.
 
....or refuse them if they are Jewish, Muslim, Atheist, Agnostic, etc. Religion should be kept out of business dealings, if you are intolerant and hateful, you need to rethink your 'religious' values and take a good look in the mirror.
My point exactly. IMO religion based refusal to make a cake borders on hate. How can a person that uses religion deny another human when the bible clearly states in John1 that we are all God's children. For centuries religion has caused more grief for humans than just about anything else.
 
....or refuse them if they are Jewish, Muslim, Atheist, Agnostic, etc. Religion should be kept out of business dealings, if you are intolerant and hateful, you need to rethink your 'religious' values and take a good look in the mirror.
Maybe we should just let you decide who gets cake and who doesn't. Your rare ability to be able to look at a person and judge whether or not they are intolerant, hateful, positive or loving reminds me of the gun lovers who think we should just sell guns to the good guys and not to the bad ones. If you think only religious people are intolerant you should look in the mirror yourself, or maybe just go back and read your posts.
 
I see this discussion is still going on and I see that there are some fundamental misunderstandings about the SC decision.

Even though LGBT brought the cases the decisions weren't about that group. The SC decisions were about the religious rights of the bakers and graphic artist and their constitutional right to hold their religious beliefs. LGBT could have been a different group, the message could have been politically different. The bakers and artists could have been Jewish or Muslim. The First Amendment of our Constitution guarantees citizens the right to hold religious beliefs without being forced to violate them.

It's over, at least for now. Everybody has an opinion but only the SC makes the final decision.

One more thing, this case would have been different had the baker (for example) refused to sell the men cookies or any other standard product of his shop. He would have lost, they would have won. In fact, in the Denver case the men were customers of the shop and the baker was acquainted with them. He had sold products to them before this issue came up. They could have forced him to sell them cookies (through the courts) but not to write a message on the cookies that violated his religious beliefs.
 
I see this discussion is still going on and I see that there are some fundamental misunderstandings about the SC decision.

Even though LGBT brought the cases the decisions weren't about that group. The SC decisions were about the religious rights of the bakers and graphic artist and their constitutional right to hold their religious beliefs. LGBT could have been a different group, the message could have been politically different. The bakers and artists could have been Jewish or Muslim. The First Amendment of our Constitution guarantees citizens the right to hold religious beliefs without being forced to violate them.

It's over, at least for now. Everybody has an opinion but only the SC makes the final decision.

One more thing, this case would have been different had the baker (for example) refused to sell the men cookies or any other standard product of his shop. He would have lost, they would have won. In fact, in the Denver case the men were customers of the shop and the baker was acquainted with them. He had sold products to them before this issue came up. They could have forced him to sell them cookies (through the courts) but not to write a message on the cookies that violated his religious beliefs.
Religious beliefs should never be involved when running a business. Religion just adds another needless division that shouldn’t be part of the equation in any shape or form.

Anybody can hold religious beliefs but when they infringe on basic human rights, it turns into discrimination. Religion doesn’t belong in a business. Period!

These men didn’t want cookies; they wanted a wedding cake so who cares whether the baker was willing to sell something else to them. That’s completely irrelevant and probably even more insulting to them.
 
My point exactly. IMO religion based refusal to make a cake borders on hate. How can a person that uses religion deny another human when the bible clearly states in John1 that we are all God's children. For centuries religion has caused more grief for humans than just about anything else.
I could not agree more Knight, well said. Many of those who profess to follow Jesus are the opposite of being Christ-like. Religion has caused wars, grief and death for many, many years now. In my opinion, the world would be better off without religion, but unfortunately, that will not happen. Thanks for your input, always appreciated and respected.
 
Religious beliefs should never be involved when running a business. Religion just adds another needless division that shouldn’t be part of the equation in any shape or form.

Anybody can hold religious beliefs but when they infringe on basic human rights, it turns into discrimination. Religion doesn’t belong in a business. Period!

These men didn’t want cookies; they wanted a wedding cake so who cares whether the baker was willing to sell something else to them. That’s completely irrelevant and probably even more insulting to them.
Amen!
 
How many people on this site have owned a service industry business?
I owned an adult lingerie store. We had trouble with transvestites. My husband banned them. They were too wild & uncontrollable in store. One locked himself in my private bathroom with a bunch of stuff to "try on". Memory getting fuzzy, but I know he ruined some stuff. Did he pay for it? I'm pretty sure he did, but still....
'
 
How many people on this site have owned a service industry business?
My primary business was as a consulting engineer, providing services to clients, I was the owner (and most of the staff). I was also in the landlord business off and on, properties I owned. My wife is an independent therapist, has been for a long time.

Not exactly baking but all within the service industry definition.
 
For centuries religion has caused more grief for humans than just about anything else.
Do you have any statistics to back that up?

Are there more actively religious people in prison than non-church goers? If you asked what motivated the 4000 plus murders in America last year, I doubt if very many were based on religion. I think greed usually tops the list. By the time Hitler killed himself he had started to ban all the churches in Germany and turned the buildings into Hitler youth headquarters. The Soviet Union banned religion and still had plenty of "grief." A lot of the wars that are considered to have been based on religion were actually caused by rulers wanting more power.

I don't think we can say how the world would be today if we had never had religion, or that religion has caused more grief than anything else, when we don't have a control group that would show us how the world would have evolved without religion.

Non-Christians love to point out all the Christians they know who don't act like Jesus. Why? We worship God we none of us profess to be like him. We don't point at Elvis fans and say they're hypocrites because they can't sing.


How many people on this site have owned a service industry business?
I haven't, but my father owned his own display/art business. If one of his clients (usually department stores) had asked him to make a window display of manikins having sex or commissioned him for a lewd painting, I'm sure he would have refused, just as he would have refused to work for racists or anti-Semites. He always thought one of the perks of being his own boss was that he had that power.
 
Religious beliefs should never be involved when running a business. Religion just adds another needless division that shouldn’t be part of the equation in any shape or form.

Anybody can hold religious beliefs but when they infringe on basic human rights, it turns into discrimination. Religion doesn’t belong in a business. Period!

These men didn’t want cookies; they wanted a wedding cake so who cares whether the baker was willing to sell something else to them. That’s completely irrelevant and probably even more insulting to them.
Exactly, religion is a belief, and you can believe anything you want. But no one should be allowed to push their beliefs on others or make laws or rules regarding those beliefs. Which religion and god are you going to worship? there are hundreds of gods and different religions. This is a couple that wants a cake, bake the freaking cake and collect your money. There is absolutely no evidence of God, as Christopher Hitchens said " Religion is poison because it asks us to give up our most precious faculty, which is that of reason, and to believe things without evidence. It then asks us to respect this, which it calls faith" no thank you, keep it to yourself. He also said "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"

What does the baker care what anyone does in the privacy of their own home? None of their business. Keep it out of schools, government and public businesses. Don't tell me what to believe. It is so infuriating.
 
Do you have any statistics to back that up?
Most wars created are religion based.
Here’s just a few examples throughout history

The following are distinguished: The First Sacred War (595–585 BCE) The Second Sacred War (449–448 BCE) The Third Sacred War (356–346 BCE)

The failure to account for faith and dogma is a mistake, Jenkins states in his introduction: “The First World War was a thoroughly religious event, in the sense that overwhelmingly Christian nations fought each other in what many viewed as a holy war, a spiritual conflict.


Brian Daizen Victoria, in his book “Zen at War” quotes renowned monk Daiun Sogaku Harada, “The unity of Zen and war of which I speak extends to the farthest reaches of the holy war [now under way].” At least in the minds of many priests, World War II was undeniably, a “holy war.”

Summary. American propaganda cast the Cold War as one of history's great religious wars, between the godless and the God-fearing, between good and evil. It was a simplistic depiction that was supported and promoted in the highest echelons of government and by the leaders of America's key institutions

What was the first war between Muslims?


The Battle of Badr

The Battle of Badr was the first large-scale confrontation between Muslims and the Quraysh. More than a thousand men engaged in the battle, which lasted hours and resulted in a decisive Muslim victory. Six years later, the Quraysh in Mecca peacefully surrendered to an army led by Mohammed. military land forces.

What conflict occurred in history because of Christianity?

Crusades: A notable example of religious conflict; took place between Christian Europe and the Muslim-controlled Middle East region between the 11th and 15th centuries. Thirty Years War: Another example of religious conflict; took place between Catholic and Protestant Christians in Europe between 1618

Was the Civil War a religious war?


It's abundantly clear, as recent scholarship has demonstrated that religion stood at the center of the Civil War for both sides. Both North and South looked to God for meaning, and each side believed—with equal fervor and certitude—that God was on its side.

Over a period of about 30 years, Arab warriors, riding fast horses and camels, conquered the entire Persian empire and much of the Byzantine. The conquered lands included Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and much of Afghanistan and Baluchistan.

What religion was in the British Civil War?


The official church was the Church of England. However, there were still serious religious tensions. Many powerful people in England, including many MPs, were Puritans, who did not believe that the Church of England was Protestant enough
 
Right, you can find many examples over thousands of years. Where are the counter examples of countries without religion and how they lived peacefully for thousands of years?
 
Right, you can find many examples over thousands of years. Where are the counter examples of countries without religion and how they lived peacefully for thousands of years?
Your question was:

Do you have any statistics to back that Up?

I offered you plenty of statistics to back that up and that was a small sample. You are kidding yourself if you don’t realize the violence and hatred brought about by religion throughout our shared history.
 


Back
Top