Denise1952
Well-known Member
Plainly, the young man was very scared. He made the mistake of setting out without extra fuel and was running out of petrol. That's why he was driving slowly. He thought it would save fuel. Any decent person who came across him in those circumstances would offer help but the 53 yr old nut case played silly buggers by overtaking him, slowing down, then hitting the brakes, thereby causing the rear end collision himself. For whatever reason the young man panicked and drove away at speed, only to be pursued down a lonely road by a man waving a pistol. Eventually bullets started to fly. This is a Mad Max scenario in real life.
Luckily so-one was hurt. I will try to keep up with the trial but it happened in South Australia and our newspapers in NSW are not likely to give it much coverage. However, Mr Google will reveal all if I ask nicely.
So the 53 year old is the one with the wife and gun, right? They are ass-ended by a guy that is low on fuel, and driving slowly? How is the 53 year old supposed to help him if he takes off at high speed, like hit and run? I missed something in this thread. I didn't see where the 53 year old came up behind him first, and passed him, then hit his breaks to cause the rear-end. Ok, I'll go read some more. Maybe it was in that "second" scenario. This second one I am still not in favor of the 53 year old though. If the other story is what happened, he is an ass for sure. Have I succeeded in confusing anyone else? I hope so cause I hate to be confused alone, LOL!!