Newsweek reports United States is the 2nd most hated country in the world

Status
Not open for further replies.
One of the most perplexing aspects of gun violence in America, and perhaps a solid reason for others to hate us, is the glaring absence of meaningful action to prevent further loss of life. Here in Florida, the governor has recently proposed lowering the legal age for purchasing firearms from 21 to 18—a move that raises significant concerns. In addition, several southern states have abolished the requirement for permits to carry concealed weapons. This change is particularly troubling as such permits required individuals to complete a training course. Now, there is no mandatory education or preparation necessary to carry a firearm.

Furthermore, certain states have legalized open carry, enabling individuals to don a holster and openly carry a loaded pistol reminiscent of a scene from a classic western. This relaxation of regulations is baffling; rather than tightening restrictions to enhance public safety, policymakers seem intent on loosening them. Advocates of these measures often point to the Second Amendment, asserting that the right to bear arms must remain uninfringed. However, this staunch defense of one constitutional amendment stands in stark contrast to the willingness to erode others—particularly the First Amendment—without hesitation.

In any rational nation, the Second Amendment would have long been subject to rigorous review and thoughtful revision. Yet, in America, it remains an untouchable relic, despite the mounting toll of gun violence.

View attachment 416946
I have yet to see a gun which killed. The nut who pulled the trigger is the same all over the world.

Yes, I carry. Yes, I pulled it once and would do so again. Under certain circumstances I, me and myself have priority.
 
Our system is a disaster , I was at the VA couple days ago and surprised how many young Veterans trying to see if they can get VA care because their jobs do not offer health care and they can not afford insurance . I suspect most will be denied .

My actual doctors visit took maybe an hour but I travelled the VA chatted , visited areas I could , ate in cafeteria an extra 4 hours and a depressing eye opener .

I have yet to see a gun which killed. The nut who pulled the trigger is the same all over the world.

Yes, I carry. Yes, I pulled it once and would do so again. Under certain circumstances I, me and myself have priority.
Good grief, are people still using that old line? It's usually followed by... "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." That doesn't seem to be working either. Oh, I almost forgot, they also wanted to arm the teachers! Can you imagine the employment interview... "Well Ms. Smith, your resume looks great, there's just one more thing, we need to take a trip down to the local shooting range to check your accuracy with a 9mm".
 

Oh, I almost forgot, they also wanted to arm the teachers! Can you imagine the employment interview... "Well Ms. Smith, your resume looks great, there's just one more thing, we need to take a trip down to the local shooting range to check your accuracy with a 9mm".
I actually liked the places where our veterans stepped up and basically said - go through me to get to those kids. Older people who had military experience volunteered to protect the schools and some did/do.
 
One of the most perplexing aspects of gun violence in America, and perhaps a solid reason for others to hate us, is the glaring absence of meaningful action to prevent further loss of life. Here in Florida, the governor has recently proposed lowering the legal age for purchasing firearms from 21 to 18—a move that raises significant concerns. In addition, several southern states have abolished the requirement for permits to carry concealed weapons. This change is particularly troubling as such permits required individuals to complete a training course. Now, there is no mandatory education or preparation necessary to carry a firearm. Furthermore, certain states have legalized open carry, enabling individuals to don a holster and openly carry a loaded pistol reminiscent of a scene from a classic western. This relaxation of regulations is baffling; rather than tightening restrictions to enhance public safety, policymakers seem intent on loosening them. Advocates of these measures often point to the Second Amendment, asserting that the right to bear arms must remain uninfringed. However, this staunch defense of one constitutional amendment stands in stark contrast to the willingness to erode others—particularly the First Amendment—without hesitation. In any rational nation, the Second Amendment would have long been subject to rigorous review and thoughtful revision. Yet, in America, it remains an untouchable relic, despite the mounting toll of gun violence.

I don’t think anyone here is arguing that gun violence isn’t a serious problem in the USA. That being said, you're mistaking emotional appeal for substantive analysis. The U.S. has over 330 million people, a uniquely violent criminal underclass, a 2,000-mile porous border with cartel activity spilling over, decades of failed urban policy, and massive socio-economic stratification. So, I can only opine that comparing that to Austria or Japan is like comparing a jet engine to a bicycle pump. And yes, the Second Amendment is treated with caution in the USA, as it should be. It’s not an outdated “relic.” It’s part of a Constitutional framework designed specifically to limit state overreach and ensure individual autonomy. Now, that may offend modern sensibilities, but it exists for a reason. The fact that other countries don’t have it doesn’t mean we should toss ours out in a panic every time someone posts a chart with out-of-context numbers. As for your claim about constitutional hypocrisy, defending the Second Amendment while supposedly eroding the First, I'd argue the reverse has been more true lately: speech is being criminalized or censored across platforms and institutions, while the right to bear arms is one of the last things some Americans feel they still have left. That sense of erosion feeds gun ownership, not the other way around. You're looking at the symptom, gun deaths, and demanding the scalpel, without diagnosing the patient. The reality is that many of the places with the strictest gun laws already have high levels of violence, and many lawful gun owners aren’t the problem. What you're advocating is a sweeping overhaul of Constitutional protections based on an emotional reaction to symptoms that are, in fact, rooted in much deeper societal decay. So, until we’re willing to have an honest conversation about why violence happens, who commits it, where it’s concentrated, what cultural and policy failures brought us here your charts and lectures won’t solve anything.
 
I have yet to see a gun which killed. The nut who pulled the trigger is the same all over the world.

Yes, I carry. Yes, I pulled it once and would do so again. Under certain circumstances I, me and myself have priority.
I have a friend here who carried with a permit as years ago you needed one not anymore and he had to shoot an escaped PB which ran at his granddaughter think this was like 10 years ago .

He saw the dog coming the owners dog chasing him with leash in her hand , he threw his granddaughter on top of a parked car and the dog was about to go up that car and he put two rounds into him .

Police came sided with him , owners dog took off so that was that .
 
I don’t think anyone here is arguing that gun violence isn’t a serious problem in the USA. That being said, you're mistaking emotional appeal for substantive analysis. The U.S. has over 330 million people, a uniquely violent criminal underclass, a 2,000-mile porous border with cartel activity spilling over, decades of failed urban policy, and massive socio-economic stratification. So, I can only opine that comparing that to Austria or Japan is like comparing a jet engine to a bicycle pump. And yes, the Second Amendment is treated with caution in the USA, as it should be. It’s not an outdated “relic.” It’s part of a Constitutional framework designed specifically to limit state overreach and ensure individual autonomy. Now, that may offend modern sensibilities, but it exists for a reason. The fact that other countries don’t have it doesn’t mean we should toss ours out in a panic every time someone posts a chart with out-of-context numbers. As for your claim about constitutional hypocrisy, defending the Second Amendment while supposedly eroding the First, I'd argue the reverse has been more true lately: speech is being criminalized or censored across platforms and institutions, while the right to bear arms is one of the last things some Americans feel they still have left. That sense of erosion feeds gun ownership, not the other way around. You're looking at the symptom, gun deaths, and demanding the scalpel, without diagnosing the patient. The reality is that many of the places with the strictest gun laws already have high levels of violence, and many lawful gun owners aren’t the problem. What you're advocating is a sweeping overhaul of Constitutional protections based on an emotional reaction to symptoms that are, in fact, rooted in much deeper societal decay. So, until we’re willing to have an honest conversation about why violence happens, who commits it, where it’s concentrated, what cultural and policy failures brought us here your charts and lectures won’t solve anything.
Do you have gun laws in Thailand ?

I only know some amazing wildlife there and love reptiles / birds / fish .
 
Good grief, are people still using that old line? It's usually followed by... "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." That doesn't seem to be working either. Oh, I almost forgot, they also wanted to arm the teachers! Can you imagine the employment interview... "Well Ms. Smith, your resume looks great, there's just one more thing, we need to take a trip down to the local shooting range to check your accuracy with a 9mm".
Please tell me what is not true about the old line.

I pulled up stats for my town 2020 to ytd. One in 2024 and it was a family dispute.

Do you prefer a teacher who is trained or a dead child?
 
I actually liked the places where our veterans stepped up and basically said - go through me to get to those kids. Older people who had military experience volunteered to protect the schools and some did/do.
We had an initiative for crisis management and volunteers from retired medical, law enforment, K9, EOD, rotary - you name it applied. Some nut cases went through Freedom of Information Act requesting personal information. The sheriff's office closed the project due to that.
 
I have a friend here who carried with a permit as years ago you needed one not anymore and he had to shoot an escaped PB which ran at his granddaughter think this was like 10 years ago .

He saw the dog coming the owners dog chasing him with leash in her hand , he threw his granddaughter on top of a parked car and the dog was about to go up that car and he put two rounds into him .

Police came sided with him , owners dog took off so that was that .
It depends on the US state.

I am glad all went well!
 
Good grief, are people still using that old line? It's usually followed by... "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." That doesn't seem to be working either. Oh, I almost forgot, they also wanted to arm the teachers! Can you imagine the employment interview... "Well Ms. Smith, your resume looks great, there's just one more thing, we need to take a trip down to the local shooting range to check your accuracy with a 9mm".

Where exactly are you getting your misinformation about it “not working”? I ask because I know from personal experience that it does. On December 23, 1976, I shot a man who had just robbed me at gunpoint while I was driving a taxicab. And on November 11, 1975, I stopped my cab on Market Street in San Francisco, jumped out with my revolver, and put a stop to a gang assaulting a man. In both cases, an armed citizen prevented further violence. So, you may roll your eyes at “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” but that phrase exists because it reflects reality for countless people who’ve faced life-or-death situations. It might not fit neatly into the narrative you prefer, but that doesn’t make it untrue.
 
Where exactly are you getting your misinformation about it “not working”? I ask because I know from personal experience that it does. On December 23, 1976, I shot a man who had just robbed me at gunpoint while I was driving a taxicab. And on November 11, 1975, I stopped my cab on Market Street in San Francisco, jumped out with my revolver, and put a stop to a gang assaulting a man. In both cases, an armed citizen prevented further violence. So, you may roll your eyes at “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” but that phrase exists because it reflects reality for countless people who’ve faced life-or-death situations. It might not fit neatly into the narrative you prefer, but that doesn’t make it untrue.
You may want to specify "shot".
 
Where exactly are you getting your misinformation about it “not working”? I ask because I know from personal experience that it does. On December 23, 1976, I shot a man who had just robbed me at gunpoint while I was driving a taxicab. And on November 11, 1975, I stopped my cab on Market Street in San Francisco, jumped out with my revolver, and put a stop to a gang assaulting a man. In both cases, an armed citizen prevented further violence. So, you may roll your eyes at “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” but that phrase exists because it reflects reality for countless people who’ve faced life-or-death situations. It might not fit neatly into the narrative you prefer, but that doesn’t make it untrue.
The statistics tell the story. The number of people killed via gun violence far exceeds the number of "bad guys" killed while inflicting the violence.
 
The statistics tell the story. The number of people killed via gun violence far exceeds the number of "bad guys" killed while inflicting the violence.

Statistics are only useful when they’re applied with context and that’s exactly what’s missing from your response. You're comparing the total number of gun deaths (which include suicides, gang violence, domestic disputes, etc.) to the far smaller subset of defensive gun uses, and then acting as if that disproves their effectiveness. It doesn’t. The fact that violence exists doesn’t negate the value of stopping it when it happens.

My point wasn’t that armed citizens stop every act of violence, it’s that they can and do stop it, often decisively, when they’re in the right place at the right time. I’ve personally been that person twice. And there are tens of thousands of defensive gun uses every year in the U.S., many of which don’t involve a shot fired, and thus never show up in your fatality stats. You’re treating statistics like they’re the whole story, when in fact they’re just one piece. Real life doesn’t always follow a spreadsheet. Sometimes it looks like a cab driver in 1976 refusing to be a victim.
 
As I posted earlier,

...The rise of Television, Hollywood movies, the Internet, and Smartphones has allowed vast numbers of people elsewhere on the planet to view Americans and what the USA does more than ever before...

Whether or not some of the issues some members are posting about like gun ownership or medical care are valid and fair, the thread topic is not about whether they are valid or fair but rather about perceptions of other people in the world about the USA. On that count, it is our media that dominantly drives perceptions not whether or not the issues are valid reasons for them to feel so.

Anyone watching American TV shows or Hollywood movies will have warped views of what is going on here because for the sake of advertising interest and ratings, such fictional shows tend to exaggerate violence, sex, crime, moral decay, attitudes, etc. And on the other side, few of the good things Americans can be proud of reach them as media in other countries has little reason to present such to their own people as they would just be bored.

No other country over decades has had so much fictional garbage constantly spewing across the world. So no wonder other people have warped views as it is our own fault as the 800 pound gorilla of media.

And then there is the Ugly American Tourist issue. (Rick Stevens essay)

Ugly American Sentiment Abroad


Europe sees two kinds of travelers: Those who view Europe through air-conditioned bus windows, socializing with their noisy American friends, and those who are taking a vacation from America, immersing themselves in different cultures, experiencing different people and lifestyles, and broadening their perspectives.

Europeans judge you as an individual, not by your government. A Greek fisherman once told me, "For me, Bush is big problem — but I like you." I have never been treated like the Ugly American. My Americaness in Europe, if anything, has been an asset.

You'll see plenty of Ugly Americans slogging through a sour Europe, mired in a swamp of complaints. Ugly Americanism is a disease, but fortunately there is a cure: A change in attitude. The best over-the-counter medicine is a mirror. Here are the symptoms.
 
Last edited:
Do you have gun laws in Thailand ? I only know some amazing wildlife there and love reptiles / birds / fish .

Yes, of course there are gun laws here in Thailand. However, I'm an American and therefore as a non-Thai I cannot own a firearm here. However, unlike when I lived in the USA, I have never felt the need to have a gun while living here. Regarding reptiles, I have killed several snakes in our yard including one Cobra. I had the other Cobra removed by professionals. We did have a huge Python in our community a while back that had to be dragged out of a tree and removed from the area. Anyway, the only reptiles I will tolerate in my home are Geckos----who are essentially guardians of our health because they eat insects.
Snake 2.jpg
 
As I posted earlier,

...The rise of Television, Hollywood movies, the Internet, and Smartphones has allowed vast numbers of people elsewhere on the planet to view Americans and what the USA does more than ever before...

Whether or not some of the issues some members are posting about like gun ownership or medical care are valid and fair, the thread topic is not about whether they are valid or fair but rather about perceptions of other people in the world about the USA. On that count, it is our media that dominantly drives perceptions not whether or not the issues are valid reasons for them to feel so.

Anyone watching American TV shows or Hollywood movies will have warped views of what is going on here because for the sake of advertising interest and ratings, such fictional shows tend to exaggerate violence, sex, crime, moral decay, attitudes, etc. And on the other side, few of the good things Americans can be proud of reach them as media in other countries has little reason to present such to their own people as they would just be bored.

No other country over decades has had so much fictional garbage constantly spewing across the world. So no wonder other people have warped views as it is our own fault as the 800 pound gorilla of media.

And then there is the Ugly American Tourist issue. (Rick Stevens essay)

Ugly American Sentiment Abroad


Europe sees two kinds of travelers: Those who view Europe through air-conditioned bus windows, socializing with their noisy American friends, and those who are taking a vacation from America, immersing themselves in different cultures, experiencing different people and lifestyles, and broadening their perspectives.

Europeans judge you as an individual, not by your government. A Greek fisherman once told me, "For me, Bush is big problem — but I like you." I have never been treated like the Ugly American. My Americaness in Europe, if anything, has been an asset.

You'll see plenty of Ugly Americans slogging through a sour Europe, mired in a swamp of complaints. Ugly Americanism is a disease, but fortunately there is a cure: A change in attitude. The best over-the-counter medicine is a mirror. Here are the symptoms.
That is very informative and very true! 👏
 
Oh boy, I see you're at it again cherry-picking the fruit while ignoring the entire orchard. Hence, you're still reducing everything to "gun laws and gun culture" as if that's some kind of all-encompassing explanation. But that’s not analysis, it’s just lazy reductionism. The USA has high per capita gun deaths, but lumping together murders, suicides, and accidents as if they all stem from the same root is intellectually dishonest.
Suicides make up the majority of gun deaths in the USA and the causes of suicide are complex such as mental illness, economic despair, social isolation and so on. So, while gun access may affect the method, it is certainly not the motive. And pretending a ban on certain firearms is going to fix that is delusional thinking. As for accidents and homicides, again, vastly different causes. Accidental shootings often reflect poor education and negligence, not some "culture." As for homicides, those are tightly concentrated in specific areas and demographics. In fact, it has not gone unnoticed that you keep refusing to engage with why, as in, why are some communities imploding while others, also with high gun ownership, are not? You want to throw “gun culture” around like it’s the singular cause while ignoring the entire socio-economic context that fuels violence in the first place. That’s like blaming spoons for obesity. The gun is the tool, not the reason. So, if we’re going to talk about the forest, then let’s talk about the soil, the climate, the root rot, not just the axe someone’s holding.


the root cause of all the gun deaths are the result of easy access t o guns and gun culture - nothing else in US is so different from anywhere else.

Yes it is that simple - but you can continue to write paragraph after paragraph trying to blame everything else if you wish.
 
Went from most hated thread to gun control.

And only took 15 pages of bickering, name calling, stat slinging and emojis to get there.

Well, this has been entertaining.


Most of us have tried hard to avoid name calling

And yes I guess gun control is relevant to people's perception of US - and understandably so.
 
So, you may roll your eyes at “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” but that phrase exists because it reflects reality for countless people who’ve faced life-or-death situations. It might not fit neatly into the narrative you prefer, but that doesn’t make it untrue.
yes, sure - there are episodes of good guy with gun saved the day - but overall the more people with more guns to stop more other people with guns - not reducing gun deaths.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top