Magna-Carta
Senior Member
- Location
- UK
We camped there on our honeymoon in 1976, very nice experience. A few years later we spent time in beautiful Banff National Park in Canada.
![]()
Definitely a place I would like to go to.
We camped there on our honeymoon in 1976, very nice experience. A few years later we spent time in beautiful Banff National Park in Canada.
![]()
I wouldn't use the term bully to describe the US but by dint of sheer might and financial wealth US is able to bend the will of other less well endowed countries. This does give rise to resentment. The US hegemony is being challenged by China and other emerging powerful blocks of nations.Actually the "maths is crappy" did irritate me, but I am glad you acknowledged the possibility.
Now for a long discussion of my thoughts. Yes the U.S. is going to hell. The debt will become unsustainable, the dollar will collapse as the Treasury actually prints real greenbacks, leading to inflation and a world seeing their $27T in U.S. equities, treasuries and plain old real estate evaporate. That flight to safety of the US dollar will be in the rear view mirror.
My expectations of this timeline taking place is now within the window of 10 years. Whatever you might think of Trump and tariffs, I consider it a last ditch attempt to push that 10 year date further off. It will likely fail.
What will be left, is a United States deeply divided, heavily armed and looking for blood.
Say what you will, but while you and others are criticizing the U.S., you might want to consider what happens when the U.S. is no longer that big bully. Who will the big bully be then? Also, you might want to hurry up on whatever plan you think you might have.
Are you calculating the 335 million people that live in the U.S.? How does that statistic measure up to your 15,666 deaths in one year?
A far more accurate measurement would be how many deaths PER THOUSAND in the population. No, I'm not going to do that research for you.
yes there are other differences - but the main one is different gun laws and different gun culture - not just to Australia but to every other western country. Other countries have inner city poverty etc - those things arent unique to US
No other thing about US is unique compared to other western countries - and consequently you have massively higher per capita gun death rate - homicides, suicides, accidents
Maybe insert a few emojis in your posts to soften the blowI hope I haven't offended you in this manner. I try to speak respectfully but maybe come across as judgmental. Sorry if I have, it is not my intention.
You are right in some of your points but how do you explain mass casualties at elementary schools, stores, and concerts? Those were not the result of the 13% of the population you refer to. Most of the murderers were just disturbed White people.
Also, how do you explain this?
What share of U.S. gun deaths are murders? What share are suicides?
Though they tend to get less public attention than gun-related murders, suicides have long accounted for the majority of U.S. gun deaths. In 2023, 58% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides (27,300), while 38% were murders (17,927). The remaining gun deaths that year involved law enforcement (604), were accidental (463) or had undetermined circumstances (434), according to CDC data.
basically sound good points imoYou’re still brushing complexity aside in an attempt to preserve your simplistic narrative. You claim “no other thing about the US is unique” compared to other Western nations, but that’s simply false. The U.S. is unique in several critical areas that directly intersect with violence rates: You don’t have a 13% minority population with vastly different historical, economic, and social trajectories, many of whom are trapped in chronically violent, segregated urban environments. You don’t have the U.S.– Mexico border or a constant pipeline for drug trafficking and cartel influence, feeding gang violence in cities like Chicago, Houston, and Los Angeles. You don’t have the same level of fatherless households, decaying school systems, or legacy of failed war-on-crime policies that gutted communities and destroyed trust in policing. Yes, Australia and other Western countries have poverty, but not on the same scale, context, or cultural fragmentation. And pretending otherwise is intellectually lazy. Gun culture is a factor, but not the factor. You’re mistaking a correlation (more guns, more gun deaths) for causation without parsing out the kind of deaths, the environments they occur in, or the structural factors that drive them. Norway and Switzerland have high rates of gun ownership too, but they do not have high homicide rates because they have different conditions. So if you're going to argue that guns are the one and only variable, you’re not analyzing, you’re proselytizing.
Brilliant reply. Thank you. Apparently you decided to pick up the gauntlet I laid at hollydolly's feet, who I believe became offended at a comment I made a few weeks ago and blocked me. IOW, you did her work for her.It seems that you are asking for statistics. And on the face of it, you seem to make a fair point, in that per capita is a better comparative measure. But if someone’s going to suggest it changes the picture, it helps if they actually show how. Saying “I’m not going to do the research...” while hinting at a different conclusion doesn’t really move things forward, for anyone -- poster nor reader.
Just for reference then, and because you asked, here is some data on firearm homicide rates per 100,000 people (i.e. intentional killing with a gun). Different sources give slightly different figures, but the general differences are the same:
United States, 2023 (Firearm homicide): 5.6 per 100,000
United Kingdom, Year Ending March 2023. The UK often quotes a Financial Year as the start of April to the end of March the following year (All homicide regardless of method or weapon): 0.99 per 100,000
Canada, 2023 (Firearm homicide): 0.72 per 100,000
Australia, 2023 - 24 (Firearm homicide): 0.30 per 100,000
It doesn’t take much digging to see the differences are quite stark, even when adjusted for population. Remove the Firearm homicide equation, and instead include all homicides, I wonder what that might look like? How far might the US surge ahead then?
It seems that you are asking for statistics. And on the face of it, you seem to make a fair point, in that per capita is a better comparative measure. But if someone’s going to suggest it changes the picture, it helps if they actually show how. Saying “I’m not going to do the research...” while hinting at a different conclusion doesn’t really move things forward, for anyone -- poster nor reader. Just for reference then, and because you asked, here is some data on firearm homicide rates per 100,000 people (i.e. intentional killing with a gun). Different sources give slightly different figures, but the general differences are the same:
United States, 2023 (Firearm homicide): 5.6 per 100,000 United Kingdom, Year Ending March 2023. The UK often quotes a Financial Year as the start of April to the end of March the following year (All homicide regardless of method or weapon): 0.99 per 100,000
Canada, 2023 (Firearm homicide): 0.72 per 100,000 Australia, 2023 - 24 (Firearm homicide): 0.30 per 100,000
It doesn’t take much digging to see the differences are quite stark, even when adjusted for population. Remove the Firearm homicide equation, and instead include all homicides, I wonder what that might look like? How far might the US surge ahead then?
I'm 82 years old and not accustomed to using emojisMaybe insert a few emojis in your posts to soften the blow![]()
I did not add anything to the cookies for last week's play date with Aussies. Does that count))
You’re still brushing complexity aside in an attempt to preserve your simplistic narrative. You claim “no other thing about the US is unique” compared to other Western nations, but that’s simply false. The U.S. is unique in several critical areas that directly intersect with violence rates: You don’t have a 13% minority population with vastly different historical, economic, and social trajectories, many of whom are trapped in chronically violent, segregated urban environments. You don’t have the U.S.– Mexico border or a constant pipeline for drug trafficking and cartel influence, feeding gang violence in cities like Chicago, Houston, and Los Angeles. You don’t have the same level of fatherless households, decaying school systems, or legacy of failed war-on-crime policies that gutted communities and destroyed trust in policing. Yes, Australia and other Western countries have poverty, but not on the same scale, context, or cultural fragmentation. And pretending otherwise is intellectually lazy. Gun culture is a factor, but not the factor. You’re mistaking a correlation (more guns, more gun deaths) for causation without parsing out the kind of deaths, the environments they occur in, or the structural factors that drive them. Norway and Switzerland have high rates of gun ownership too, but they do not have high homicide rates because they have different conditions. So if you're going to argue that guns are the one and only variable, you’re not analyzing, you’re proselytizing.
I didn't say gun laws and gun culture are the only variable but they are the one big difference between US and every other western country If you somehow think all these other factors are the reason for your gun death rate that is so much higher than everyone else's, so be it Seems a denial of the obvious to me - trying to find zebras, if you like.
Lack of a national healthcare program. Moreover, our existing system is likely the most expensive healthcare in the world. Many have to choose between medication and food.Please give us an example of human rights being ignored in the U.S.
You’re shifting the goalposts, January. First you claimed that “no other thing about the US is unique,” but now you’re retreating to “gun laws and culture are the one big difference
Because they have a different gun culture ,exactly what I have been saying all along. I can't see anywhere saying Canada has same rate of gun ownership as US thoughSwitzerland, Canada, and Norway all have substantial gun ownership, yet their homicide rates are nowhere near ours. Why?
No, not shifting any goal posts - am saying exactly what I have said all along- none of the things you mention are unique t o US, other western countries also have poverty ,gangs, fatherless households etc , none of these things are i n any way unique to US - and the one big difference in US compared t o all the other western countries is the gun laws and gun culture.
Both things exactly what I have said all along
But hey, if you want to think umpteen other things are the reason for the massive gun deaths difference so be it.
Because they have a different gun culture ,exactly what I have been saying all along. I can't see anywhere saying Canada has same rate of gun ownership as US though
Let me give you a hint -- you apparently live in the UK. You are neither subject to nor associated with the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution. Therefore, your data collection effort doesn't amount to much with me. And to be quite blunt and at the risk of repeating myself throughout this thread, I don't care what you (meaning those who live outside the USA) think about firearms, the reason for the 2A, and similar discussions. In a word, what you think and believe is meaningless and has no impact on citizens of the USA.
Automobiles, planes.... in the wrong hands, anything is a weaponBut apart from all that, my overall point is simply this -- weapons are not limited to firearms. If firearm ownership is restricted (as presumably is the case in the UK), if somebody is pissed off enough, they'll use whatever weapon is handy to commit violence. And yes, that happens in the UK as well as it does everywhere.
Hmm I wonder, there's a few other contenders.China still seems to be doing OK as the first most hated country in the world?
Our system is a disaster , I was at the VA couple days ago and surprised how many young Veterans trying to see if they can get VA care because their jobs do not offer health care and they can not afford insurance . I suspect most will be denied .Lack of a national healthcare program. Moreover, our existing system is likely the most expensive healthcare in the world. Many have to choose between medication and food.
This is nothing but a stereotype which is being held onto as much as possible.Lack of a national healthcare program. Moreover, our existing system is likely the most expensive healthcare in the world. Many have to choose between medication and food.
I thought that has been touched on already. There is often considerable difference beween facilities. OKC for example works hand in hand with OU and several huge medical systems. World class care and providers.Our system is a disaster , I was at the VA couple days ago and surprised how many young Veterans trying to see if they can get VA care because their jobs do not offer health care and they can not afford insurance . I suspect most will be denied .
My actual doctors visit took maybe an hour but I travelled the VA chatted , visited areas I could , ate in cafeteria an extra 4 hours and a depressing eye opener .