JimBob1952
Senior Member
IMO the racial makeup of the nation doesn't matter.
What matters most to me is that we develop our nation's human capital to meet the challenges of the future.
![]()
Hmmm.....I don't see that happening anytime soon.
IMO the racial makeup of the nation doesn't matter.
What matters most to me is that we develop our nation's human capital to meet the challenges of the future.
![]()
always willing to be educatedArabic is a language, not a 'people'. .... Japan and China do not speak Arabic, but they are Asians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Standard_Arabic
Just read this link. Wow!
if i'm still here i'll check it out and give you the details when i get up there with you. *grins*Oh, I truly hope so. Wish I could be here to witness it.
Not understanding why skin color is still such an issue with some people.
It is one of those definitional/bureaucratic labelling problems with what to call people from India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka versus people such as Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and Cambodian. Indians, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans and Bangladeshis who look similar racially but are from countries that are on the continent that includes Oriental races such as China and Japan. The latest jargon is to call people from India or Pakistani who are American, "Indo-Americans" rather than just lumping them in under the rubric "Asian". The problem with labelling Indo-Americans as Asian Americans is creates a bigger number, making it seem as though Asians are fast replacing Caucasian Americans as the majority, which is alarmist to some people.The orient...but I'm English so perhaps the terminology is different for us.
>>And frankly, the the content of their character [behavior] that i have experienced is not conducive to embracing them. >>
Now that kind of categorizing bothers me. But since it doesn't bother you, so be it.