Yes, since they were established they have changed the date a few times, starting with 1914, then 1925, then 1975.Did the JW's believe that???
Yes, since they were established they have changed the date a few times, starting with 1914, then 1925, then 1975.Did the JW's believe that???
Criticizing the brutality of Israel's government and the IDF is not anti-semitism. Besides, I'll bet Palestinian people are 'more' semitic than half the Israeli Jews. So many Israeli people look like Europeans. As for the statement, 'from the river to the sea', Israeli politicians have used the same phrase and settlers are already planning their move into Gaza at the first opportunity.......
And believe it or not, many Jews are members of the AfD, since it is the only party which condems the antisemitism of left groups. They gather and cry "From the river to the sea" which means the total destruction of Israel. There is no reaction from partys except the AfD.
Living stays the same and the B.S. keeps changing. Same old Same old.So - according to today's news, Germany is having a resurgence of extreme right-wing politics, of the sort that they haven't had there since WW2. Probably the generation who are too young to remember that war are determined to do it all over again. This time, the chosen enemy is the Muslims who have moved into Germany.
Israel sounds like it is about to go up in flames, unless they manage to get rid of Netanyahu.
And I often get the feeling that this country is on the verge of a civil war. Great times we're living in!
Living stays the same and the B.S. keeps changing. Same old Same old.
All used to read a newspaper and spread by word of mouth. Months passed.
Then Radio, weeks passed. TV same stuff.
Internet, Constant crap, lies, false truth and just constant stupid video stuff. Nothing about human nature changed just the way BS spreads.
People now drive everywhere with a 14Pro hanging on the dash like a TV set. Lost in their own mind!
I think after the end of WWII there was always war between some countries. And I think that the military industial complex is fueling them. Perhaps we should stop it at first.Things seem to me to be about the same as they have always been. We're always on the brink somewhere. We had the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland killing each other, but now they've stopped. We had turmoil in the Balkans but I guess that's over. There is always a civil war somewhere in Africa. Israel and the Arabs have been at war multiple times. Iraq and Iran killed hundreds of thousands of each others' people.
US troops aren't fighting anywhere right now, so that's a good thing. Other than that, I don't see much that's different, or much that will change depending on which party I vote for.
I think after the end of WWII there was always war between some countries. And I think that the military industial complex is fueling them. Perhaps we should stop it at first.
At the moment Poland is doing it's armament on a huge scale. It seems that the U.S. want this country as the new block against Russia.
It could easily be argued western business and agencies crossing borders and setting up mines, wells and sweatshops has contributed to the so called extremism.I agree. I think all the so called extremism is a direct result of Western governments opening borders to everyone and making their own law abiding citizens pay for it.![]()
I agree. I think all the so called extremism is a direct result of Western governments opening borders to everyone and making their own law abiding citizens pay for it.![]()
Interesting observation, but all the aggression post WWII has come from the non-capitalist side. Korea, Vietnam, ISIS, Taliban, Russia, al-Qaeda. Capitalism doesn't dictate anything, it just is.China is expanding both its military and its capabilities big time right now.
And hate to mix and match threads and bang the drum everywhere - but capitalism dictates the Military Industrial Complex should help feed it.
Interesting observation, but all the aggression post WWII has come from the non-capitalist side. Korea, Vietnam, ISIS, Taliban, Russia, al-Qaeda. Capitalism doesn't dictate anything, it just is.
You'll not be surprised to know I don't think this is a fair representation.
You have to look at this in detail, but one example is Afghanistan. Successive countries, and governments, have helped destroy the country. We must take some responsibility for this. If we're going to attack a country, destroy its infrastructure, poison its land with mines and the leftovers from depleted Uranium, then can we really criticize those who want something better/safer for their families?
Somehow there needs to be a recognition that our governments decisions have consequences, and we can't get on our high horses about sovereignty when we'd happily fly jets and bombers over someone else's land. The vast majority of Afghani's weren't involved in the ills of the country - they're the collateral damage. We, the tax payer, pay for all of it, but we're balking when it comes to solutions.
The US/UK continue to support the rebels in Syria. The war has displaced 7.5m people. What do you expect them to do? Take their wives and families into the war zone?
What I'm saying is - a migrants reasons for leaving their homeland isn't simply to enjoy the benefits of Western life, there are fundamental reasons they're moving, and too often we, as a society, as too busy hating on them to care about the root cause, of which we (by association) might be responsible.
I agree with a lot of this but also don't believe in the complete innocence of these people. They will choose a new country based upon who will give them the most for the least and why are these migrants all young single males of fighting age? Why are there no wives and children present?You'll not be surprised to know I don't think this is a fair representation.
You have to look at this in detail, but one example is Afghanistan. Successive countries, and governments, have helped destroy the country. We must take some responsibility for this. If we're going to attack a country, destroy its infrastructure, poison its land with mines and the leftovers from depleted Uranium, then can we really criticize those who want something better/safer for their families?
Somehow there needs to be a recognition that our governments decisions have consequences, and we can't get on our high horses about sovereignty when we'd happily fly jets and bombers over someone else's land. The vast majority of Afghani's weren't involved in the ills of the country - they're the collateral damage. We, the tax payer, pay for all of it, but we're balking when it comes to solutions.
The US/UK continue to support the rebels in Syria. The war has displaced 7.5m people. What do you expect them to do? Take their wives and families into the war zone?
What I'm saying is - a migrants reasons for leaving their homeland isn't simply to enjoy the benefits of Western life, there are fundamental reasons they're moving, and too often we, as a society, as too busy hating on them to care about the root cause, of which we (by association) might be responsible.
Most likely Beaten and Raped repeatedly. No womans rights there!I agree with a lot of this but also don't believe in the complete innocence of these people. They will choose a new country based upon who will give them the most for the least and why are these migrants all young single males of fighting age? Why are there no wives and children present?![]()
I agree with a lot of this but also don't believe in the complete innocence of these people. They will choose a new country based upon who will give them the most for the least and why are these migrants all young single males of fighting age? Why are there no wives and children present?![]()
Errr, not really, no.... white rural areas are loaded with them....It's akin to my watching an season of Cops and proclaiming, "why are all Americans breaking the law? Why are they all on illegal drugs?" Preposterous, right?
I think you're ignoring that Western countries have gone into other countries and attempted and frequently succeeded in changing their governments, or setting one faction against another with maybe the hope of influence or arms-length attacks on Western enemies. From Cuba to Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Egypt, Iraq, countries all over S. America.....none of your mentions were involved in those various fiascos.Interesting observation, but all the aggression post WWII has come from the non-capitalist side. Korea, Vietnam, ISIS, Taliban, Russia, al-Qaeda. Capitalism doesn't dictate anything, it just is.
I agree with what you've said, but what do you think is going to happen as the planet warms up and southern countries begin to have problems with supporting crops and water loss? And those issues are coming. Maybe not in the next 40 or 60 years, but it will come.I feel I should also say - the migrant situation needs to be urgently addressed. What's going on right now is not supportable in the long term. We have to use bigger brains to find a solution. One of those, I think, is given these people reason to remain in their own country. However, all I see in the media is something like "ship them back! Tell them to go away!"
It'd take something for me to walk back into a war zone, or to abject poverty.
Typical whataboutism. Hard to compare an incompetent incursion into Cuba with an all out invasion by North Korea leading to 3 million deaths. And comparing Western capitalism to Communist dictatorship (or Islamic dictatorship) is like comparing apples to dog poop.I think you're ignoring that Western countries have gone into other countries and attempted and frequently succeeded in changing their governments, or setting one faction against another with maybe the hope of influence or arms-length attacks on Western enemies. From Cuba to Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Egypt, Iraq, countries all over S. America.....none of your mentions were involved in those various fiascos.
And with many of them, there were handouts to Western businesses that took the form of contracts to rebuild what had been destroyed. So more supports for Western capitalism.
Immigration does provide benefits, but the Irish and the Vietnamese came here legally. We can't remain a free and stable country without a greater measure of control over who enters and remains here. We don't need a border wall, just Canadian-style controls over who comes in and who gets to stay. The current system, or lack of system, is a form of insanity.You know what they say about dark clouds and silver linings.
The Irish famine of the 19th century provided the workforce to build New York.
There's also opportunities for new migrants to contribute to a future society. Many of the kids of the Vietnamese immigrants are highly skilled professionals. In my new field of work I'm meeting some Africans who are contributing to the benefit of Australian society.
Much depends on the prevailing attitudes, flip a coin heads for optimism and hope, tails for pessimism and fear mongering.
ALL powerful countries, no matter what their form of government have been responsible for billions of deaths. There is plenty of evidence that capitalism has killed billions of people in other countries in it's aggressions. The same is true for Communist aggressions. So the comparison shows us that we still are motivated by competition,. Maybe we will learn someday that cooperation works much better than war.I think you're ignoring that Western countries have gone into other countries and attempted and frequently succeeded in changing their governments, or setting one faction against another with maybe the hope of influence or arms-length attacks on Western enemies. From Cuba to Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Egypt, Iraq, countries all over S. America.....none of your mentions were involved in those various fiascos.
And with many of them, there were handouts to Western businesses that took the form of contracts to rebuild what had been destroyed. So more supports for Western capitalism.