similar to ^^^^^ after a brief hello, would add "say hi to xyz" as i walked away.This. ^^^^^
Otherwise, I would keep my mouth shut.
Look up history, kiddo. Men cheat. It's in the bone marrow. I'm sure your mamma explained that to you. You should have listened to your mamma instead of thinking you knew it all.Why the name calling reserved for the woman, and not Ron?
Seems rather unfair.
Oh my, what an odd perspective. Most of my clients are male, I doubt 15% would agree with you. Of those that did, the majority would have substance abuse problems, or deep seated misogyny, or both.Look up history, kiddo. Men cheat. It's in the bone marrow. I'm sure your mamma explained that to you. You should have listened to your mamma instead of thinking you knew it all.![]()
I admire your restraint!Oh my, what an odd perspective. Most of my clients are male, I doubt 15% would agree with you. Of those that would, the majority would have substance abuse problems, or deep seated misogyny, or both.![]()
Not the same scenario.Remember the Betty Broderick Story? True!
No one thought she'd lose her mind like she did when she found out her husband was cheating with his much younger assistant. He was a lawyer and Betty was the super wife, super mom who was well liked in the community. She did everything for him and the kids during his long years of work and part time law school.
When she found out, the pain of the betrayal set her off on a course no one would ever think of. He moved out and he and the assistant began living together. Betty harassed the hell out of him. Left filthy, crazy and numerous phone messages. Even the kids were getting upset with her. He ultimately married the assistant.
Finally she bought a gun, went to his house with the key her gave to his daughter, found them asleep and shot them both to death.
No one really knows how someone will react to a devastating thing like this. That is why I'm against telling her.
And she looks exactly like what she is.It’s been 30 years since Betty Broderick was convicted of shooting her ex-husband and his younger new bride to death in their bedroom, but she won’t be getting out of prison any time soon.
https://www.oxygen.com/true-crime-buzz/when-is-betty-broderick-getting-released-from-prison
One of the reasons she'll never be released is she sees nothing wrong with what she did & thinks her 2 victims brought it on themselves & deserved it.It’s been 30 years since Betty Broderick was convicted of shooting her ex-husband and his younger new bride to death in their bedroom, but she won’t be getting out of prison any time soon.
https://www.oxygen.com/true-crime-buzz/when-is-betty-broderick-getting-released-from-prison
In other words, a psychopath.One of the reasons she'll never be released is she sees nothing wrong with what she did & thinks her 2 victims brought it on themselves & deserved it.
That's usually the case, unlessdoes shoot the messenger ring a bell?
Bingo. Or maybe snap a picture with cell phone, have it printed and mail anonymously to the wife.I would advise Ron to tell Judy.
People have a right to their opinions and to choose not to interfere with in marriage of others, which could backfire and cause them a big problem. Just because the observer "knows" the "victim", does not relate in any way to the depth of such a friendship. There might not be any relationship, but merely a neighborly acquaintanceship. Besides, how do you know the guy wasn't stuck in a sexless marriage? One of the figures I see is that maybe 20% of marriages are such.If you saw/knew for fact, I believe you should have told your friend.
I'm sure many people would disagree with this viewpoint, but in my opinion it'd be harder in the longrun for her to know "everybody but herself" knew what he was doing.
Bingo!I never judge the marriage of anyone I know. I have learned through a long life that only two people know they truth regarding a marriage. Those two people are the couple involved in the marriage.
I believe in doing the right thing. If nothing comes of it, & no changes are made, that's fine with me; I did my part in protecting the healthPeople have a right to their opinions and to choose not to interfere with in marriage of others, which could backfire and cause them a big problem. Just because the observer "knows" the "victim", does not relate in any way to the depth of such a friendship. There might not be any relationship, but merely a neighborly acquaintanceship. Besides, how do you know the guy wasn't stuck in a sexless marriage? One of the figures I see is that maybe 20% of marriages are such.
What makes you so sure the wife does not already know he is cheating? Maybe she is also cheating. And if you say he should then get a divorce, that brings up another problem. He could lose at least half of everything he owns. If children are involved, he could lose three-quarters, or more, of what he owns, or will earn in the future.
There are number of reasons for his "cheating". I never judge the marriage of anyone I know. I have learned through a long life that only two people know they truth regarding a marriage. Those two people are the couple involved in the marriage.