Joey
Member
only when I'm smokin dope?Don't you see the resemblance to Dracula?
only when I'm smokin dope?Don't you see the resemblance to Dracula?
I also think that the idea that scripture is the "inerrant, infallible word of God" is a nonsense because it does not allow different insights to emerge. It encourages dogmatism and ignores the fact that the old and new testaments are a collection of books composed by different people or sects with different purposes. Job is essentially a debate about the reason for human suffering. Song of Songs is a book of love poems or letters. The NT gospels chronicle the ministry of Jesus, viewing it from different perspectives and tailored for different audiences. Paul's epistles were written to instruct and encourage newly formed, but scattered, christian communities. Different purposes for different times and different audiences. Inspired, yes, but inerrant and every word dictated by God? A rather irrational conclusion.Google AI Overview on the question "scholars don't believe in inerrancy"
This statement is generally accurate; most biblical scholars do not subscribe to the doctrine of biblical inerrancy, which claims the Bible is completely without error in every detail, including historical and scientific accounts; they often argue that the Bible contains errors or inconsistencies that are incompatible with a strictly literal interpretation due to the historical context and literary forms used in the text.
Nice post I like its spots the word I'm lookin for logic - but is God logic - well not sure does he need to be? When I read the OT books I can clearly feel his over-arching hand guiding and chastizing often too even his own chosen people? and where do you think all or love comes from to write poems songs and letters if not originally from God? Paul was staunchly first instructed and guided from a more traditional God and then met his son on a road somewher and what an epiphany that was!! come come Warri can't you see the bigger picture ? - love from a christian brother!I also think that the idea that scripture is the "inerrant, infallible word of God" is a nonsense because it does not allow different insights to emerge. It encourages dogmatism and ignores the fact that the old and new testaments are a collection of books composed by different people or sects with different purposes. Job is essentially a debate about the reason for human suffering. Song of Songs is a book of love poems or letters. The NT gospels chronicle the ministry of Jesus, viewing it from different perspectives and tailored for different audiences. Paul's epistles were written to instruct and encourage newly formed, but scattered, christian communities. Different purposes for different times and different audiences. Inspired, yes, but inerrant and every word dictated by God? A rather irrational conclusion.
Saul is a used cart con man. His direct line to Jesus, IMO Irrelevant due to mental incapacity.Paul was staunchly first instructed and guided from a more traditional God and then met his son on a road somewher and what an epiphany that was!! come come Warri can't you see the bigger picture ? - love from a christian brother!
erhmm - and you have evidence ;proof of this mental incapacity with relevant quote??Saul is a used cart con man. His direct line to Jesus, IMO Irrelevant due to mental incapacity.
Interesting read from Josephus. I had not seen this account before. I have read Josephus' account of the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans. A very graphic account indeed.In his first forty years, Moses accomplished a great deal. The Jewish historian Josephus says that as its general, he led Egypt's army into Ethiopia, where he took an Ethiopian wife to secure peace with the Ethiopians rather than put them to the edge of the sword.
How Moses Made War with the Ethiopians.
Lots of hanky panky there for sure! Sure questions are welcome here. What else is there! Modern areas are different now.
Moses Etheopian wife - Bing Exodus
Don't need proof, Saul does. Christianity fine without his overbearing presence, without injection of his ego.erhmm - and you have evidence ;proof of this mental incapacity with relevant quote??
Yes, I can see a bigger picture. I think we are looking at different parts of the same mosaic thinking that we know everything about the whole. I have read quite a lot, but it is what I have experienced that has taught me the most important lessons.come come Warri can't you see the bigger picture ? - love from a christian brother!
Don't need proof, Saul does. Christianity fine without his overbearing presence, without injection of his ego
He was on his way to sell a bridge in Brooklyn. Egotistical phony.but he had an epiphany on the road?
I always understood him to be a maker of tents and an avid persecutor of Christian Jews.Saul is a used cart con man. His direct line to Jesus, IMO Irrelevant due to mental incapacity.
Then he came upon this Great Idea and there were suckers born every minute.I always understood him to be a maker of tents and an avid persecutor of Christian Jews.
Your assessment, but not mine.Then he came upon this Great Idea and there were suckers born every minute.
I told you guys, a Used CARt salesman with a great intro that could suck you right in. Charlatan from the get go.did he make tents as a sideline to priesthood duties?
Yes, although I claim special insight into the character of the Jewish mind, unchanging, I believe, from Avram's conversion.Your assessment, but not mine.
When my son was four he wrote a book, in pictures, which I still have. In it, the God figure was a lonely boy seeking company which he had to create, in a bottle of his creation. Dinosaurs were fun at first, but ultimately boring to the boy who destroyed them to create people---------much more interesting to ease the pain of the boy being ALONE.after all if you recall in the being of the OT at the conception of creating humans one of the dictates from God was " I give you a free spirit" - he knew what would happen perhaps but it was after all an experiment? like the dinosaur era which had to killed off with a meteorite?
Saul/Paul was never a Jewish priest. He was your ordinary everyday zealot and a pharisee until he became a christian leader and rival of Peter (the fisherman). He did support himself at times by making tents but mostly, like Jesus, he relied on contributions from his followers. @Pepper, is this what you have been referring to when you imply that he was a conman?did he make tents as a sideline to priesthood duties?
He was a SALESMAN. He sold you a load. Doesn't matter if he sold tents, or took bribes. He was a Salesman. He sold the bridge in Brooklyn before there was a Brooklyn.Saul/Paul was never a Jewish priest. He was your ordinary everyday zealot and a pharisee until he became a christian leader and rival of Peter (the fisherman). He did support himself at times by making tents but mostly, like Jesus, he relied on contributions from his followers. @Pepper, is this what you have been referring to when you imply that he was a conman?
You misunderstand my point completely. And yes, it is a pitch based on Saul's own ego. Take it or leave it.Does that sound like a sales pitch?.
Yes, people love good stories. There are many classics still alive and well today.Didn't have to work, but it did, and took all the "known" Western world with it. The stamp of Judaism is forever on Western Civilization. Taking hold of the Jews is irrelevant; taking hold of everyone else is the marvel.
What did I misunderstand? You claim he was a great salesman. He sold Jesus to thousands of people. He wasn't even selling the good Jesus, but some knock off. The story that he tells of Jesus, is just one that attracted believers.You misunderstand my point completely. And yes, it is a pitch based on Saul's own ego. Take it or leave it.
Saul The Dave Clark Five compared to Beatles. A knockoff.