Whoa Boy! Where did you get that from?I agree with you............Maybe it's time for women to be women and go back to the kitchen.
Whoa Boy! Where did you get that from?I agree with you............Maybe it's time for women to be women and go back to the kitchen.
MarciKS, before you drag me out and lynch me. The line about women in the kitchen, I believe, is what the "crisis" expert was hinting at, while not mentioning it.Fuzzy first of all how would you like it if some woman told you that your place was in the kitchen not out being a man? You wouldn't find that at all degrading?
And I don't see how we can blame whether or not they've had sex as a reasonable excuse for going on a killing spree. I haven't had sex in over 20 yrs. I have yet to have the desire to smoke everyone out.
I DO know what you mean....well put!I have never really understood feminists. I don't think either s*x should be tearing the other down but we don't seem to know how to build each other up. You know what I mean? I do feel that men have certain advantages that women will never have. Here in KS men still get more pay for the same job. Things like that. But let me ask you this...in all the years you men have been alive have you ever felt equal with your spouses?
I have noticed just from observations at work that a lot of the young women aren't interested in the young men anymore. They wanna go to school and do something with their lives. They don't want someone who is gonna do dishes in McDonald's his whole life and spend his weekends smokin dope and playin video games in his underwear. Like I do minus the dope. LOL!
My bad. I believe that is what the 'crisis' expert was hinting at, but not saying.Whoa Boy! Where did you get that from?
Plus you've got all these "liberated" young ladies feeling absolutely free to say "F***-off, loser!" to every young man who dares to approach her before he's accumulated the wealth she's heard about from her favorite youtuber.Whatever the crisis is that's ailing young men, please don't blame it on women. Asking what's due you and fixing the wrongs of the past -- as women are doing -- shouldn't cause a crisis for anyone.
Drugs, alcohol, awful food, video games, social media, broken families, dead-end jobs, a culture that emphasizes pleasure and immediate gratification over achievement and compassion, ready availability of high-powered semiautomatic weapons, lack of exercise and constructive play, social isolation...so many reasons for despair, very few answers.
Where are you getting your information from?Plus you've got all these "liberated" young ladies feeling absolutely free to say "F***-off, loser!" to every young man who dares to approach her before he's accumulated the wealth she's heard about from her favorite youtuber.
That struggle is real, I'm not joking.
Mostly from the boys I talk to around here. Almost every day boys from about 13 to 19 years old come and talk to me about troubles at home and at school and problems with gangs and all kinds of stuff. Sometimes they come alone, sometimes in groups of 3 or 4. Most of them don't live with their dads. But I also hear it from my grandsons and nephews.Where are you getting your information from?
fuzzy nobody is lynching anyone. good grief.MarciKS, before you drag me out and lynch me. The line about women in the kitchen, I believe, is what the "crisis" expert was hinting at, while not mentioning it.
that comment was totally incalled for since i did nothing but ask you a question which you could have bothered to explain rather than point your teddy paw at me.My bad. I believe that is what the 'crisis' expert was hinting at, but not saying.
BTW, promise me you won't get together with MarciKS.![]()
Marci, I apologize. It was a poor attempt at humor. I think the "crisis" expert was inferring that women were the cause of the " young men's crisis". That's what I meant with "back in the kitchen" as to what he alluding to.-not me.that comment was totally incalled for since i did nothing but ask you a question which you could have bothered to explain rather than point your teddy paw at me.
It exists all through the animal kingdom as well. Not every critter can attract a mate.This thread may not referring to this directly, but what the majority of posts seem to be referring indirectly is a group of young men referred to as "Incels". (a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.) Unfortunately, there will always be people (male and female) who will be considered unattractive to the opposite sex - and some will always blame the rejectors rather than taking a good look at themselves. I feel a degree of compassion but I don't even pretend to know what the solution is - or even if there is one. I suspect that it has been around since the beginning of humans and exists in every society.
This thread has really been all over the map, and gotten way off track, but there's hope. I agree with @dseag2, there is a segment of young men who, for a wide host of reasons, have become disenfranchised and disconnected. It's my belief that some of these young [broken] young men choose to join extremist causes, or become the 'lone wolf' that stalks society with an automatic weapon.I just watched a segment on Bill Maher (yes, I know) in which his panelists talked about the reason so many young men are so angry and possibly becoming domestic terrorists. I posted a while back about how I didn't understand why so many 20-something men were involved in shootings, etc. so I thought this was insightful...
alwaysIt's not. My bad. I misunderstood what you meant. Forgive me?
I agree with various comments other people made, but was most drawn to yours.I disagree strongly with the notion that young men or boys in the U.S. are generally in some sort of 'crisis.' Even when children come from impoverished single parent homes, most of them turn out quite well. Adversity while growing up is often the mother of strength and character in adult life. The fact that we seem to be having so many 'new' problems with shootings and mass murders must, in my view, be attributed to: 1) the breakdown of family culture. Some people should simply not have children. "The apple does not fall far from the tree" and; 2) the ready availability of semi-automatic military type assault weaponry that has absolutely no reason to exist in any civilized society. Unfortunately, the U.S. has ceased being the civilized society it once was. When I grew up around all the guns my WW2 vet NRA father used to have, semi-automatic assault rifles were simply not part of the landscape. Hunting deer with an assault rifle would have been anathema to someone like my dad. How these crazy weapons became 'mainstream' without opposition is simply a reflection of how crazy many of our adult male citizens have become in the U.S. In short, boys and young men are not the problem. Old men are the problem. Old crazy men.
That one requires a leap of imagination to be sure. First, we have to identify an actual crisis, rather than make one up. If we can do that, then we have to establish that women are actually withholding affection and sex at some unprecedented level. Then we would have to determine what specifically results when that happens. To say that women withholding sex leads to _______ (insert any current crisis of modern society), is the non sequitur fallacy: (Does not follow logically), unless one can make an actual connection.My objection is to the "crisis" expert, who seems to offer veiled accusations that the "crisis" is caused by women withholding affection and sex.
I just watched a segment on Bill Maher (yes, I know) in which his panelists talked about the reason so many young men are so angry and possibly becoming domestic terrorists. I posted a while back about how I didn't understand why so many 20-something men were involved in shootings, etc. so I thought this was insightful...
I just watched the Maher segment - hadn't watched it before - had previously read several articles on that particular subject. I was underwhelmed by the individual advocating this point of view. He almost seemed to be whining. He seemed to feel that women should be acting like those of the early 1900's and WWII war females - devoting their time and attention to inflating male egos and dispensing gratuitous sex. Most women want to be valued for who they are and they are gradually becoming unwilling to play that role.