Warrigal
SF VIP
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
Elbows up to you, Laurie.We're not going to annex Canada. Their hockey teams suck and they have no clue how to play baseball.
Elbows up to you, Laurie.We're not going to annex Canada. Their hockey teams suck and they have no clue how to play baseball.
I started re-watching this and saw 2 episodes last night.Michael Palin of Monty Python fame did an interesting documentary on Venezuela.
The U.S. sells munitions, including bombs to several countries, probably over 100.There are U.S. bombs being dropped there; they're just not being dropped by the U.S. Israel is doing the dropping, but they are U.S. made bombs. Pretty much all munitions used by Israel are made in the U.S.A.
Fact check... 30% of Israel's arms are from Germany. That's nearly 1/3rd.Pretty much all munitions used by Israel are made in the U.S.A.
I think Putin's determination to help himself to Ukraine would qualify. But I don't want the US to become either one of those.I haven't seen anything like this since Hitler helped himself to Poland. This could be leading into an unstoppable world war.
It does feel like Venezuela is a test to see how the world reacts and that confidence is building to continue United States aggression.I haven't seen anything like this since Hitler helped himself to Poland. This could be leading into an unstoppable world war.
It does test the popular US sentiment's trusting the judgement of one person to take that action. It did seem like a war that came out of the blue, without warning, congressional approval, and possibly in violation of "international law" (whatever that is). For myself, not saying it was right or wrong, but I needed more information. It's same way I felt about WMD in Iraq before the invasion. Americans are quick to drink the koolaide, get involved in wars, but don't seem to have the stomach for it when things go south.It does feel like Venezuela is a test to see how the world reacts and that confidence is building to continue United States aggression.
It’s interesting to me that the reasons given to capture Maduro revolved around his drug and weapons activities, today the news cycle contains almost no mention of anything other than oil and money for the United States.It does test the popular US sentiment's trusting the judgement of one person to take that action. It did seem like a war that came out of the blue, without warning, congressional approval, and possibly in violation of "international law" (whatever that is). For myself, not saying it was right or wrong, but I needed more information. It's same way I felt about WMD in Iraq before the invasion. Americans are quick to drink the koolaide, get involved in wars, but don't seem to have the stomach for it when things go south.
With Venezuela, it's been in and out so far, so we don't see people objecting, but then it wasn't much of a contest. We may have just as well invaded Tierra del Fuego. But it's ominous. Where are we going with this?
It seems to me for as long as I've been an adult. A president starts a war, police action, or whatever it's called, and everyone thinks it's the right thing to do, and then everyone hates the next president, or next four presidents, for not stopping it.One big question that I have about the possibility of United States expansion is who our next president may be. The things being discussed need a much longer time horizon than two or three years.
The US has no occupation forces in Venezuela. It was an in and out mission with one purpose. Apprehend Maduro. The military was used for a criminal apprehension.I haven't seen anything like this since Hitler helped himself to Poland. This could be leading into an unstoppable world war.
According to this morning's news the Administration has stated that they will "run" Venezuelan oil production.The US has no occupation forces in Venezuela. It was an in and out mission with one purpose. Apprehend Maduro. The military was used for a criminal apprehension.
An actual US Occupation would turn into years of guerilla warfare. The CIA will continue to use their network down there to continue to destabilize the regime/Maduro allies. It will be a cold war.
People initially think it's the right thing to do because all they hear is the official spin. Eventually the facts start to leak out and the real motivations for these wars become clear.It seems to me for as long as I've been an adult. A president starts a war, police action, or whatever it's called, and everyone thinks it's the right thing to do, and then everyone hates the next president, or next four presidents, for not stopping it.
Who's surprised? Show of hands, please...According to this morning's news the Administration has stated that they will "run" Venezuelan oil production.
They say the US oil companies that had property seized will get it back and rebuild/run them. That would require security for those facilities without serious regime and policy change from the Venezuelans. They're probably maintaining the blockade for leverage to that end.According to this morning's news the Administration has stated that they will "run" Venezuelan oil production.
The same thing happened in West Germany. But has it happened since then? I'm trying to think of an example. Something was different about that war. One thing comes to mind. We won it, hands down with unconditional surrender. It seems like most of the time we end up getting out and leaving the place in a shambles. But we sure showed 'em by leaving the place in chaos.TThinking back to after WW-2 when America occupied Japan.
Summation in that reference
The occupation successfully guided Japan's transition from a militaristic empire to a democratic nation, with lasting effects on Japanese society and its relationship with the U.S.
Seems reasonable to me to apply that same thinking.
The occupation of Japan, beginning in 1945 (following it's surrender) was authorized by the Allied Powers, led by the U.S., in coalition with the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China.The same thing happened in West Germany. But has it happened since then? I'm trying to think of an example. Something was different about that war. One thing comes to mind. We won it, hands down with unconditional surrender. It seems like most of the time we end up getting out and leaving the place in a shambles. But we sure showed 'em by leaving the place in chaos.
They're being truthful about this one: we're going to steal their oil. They've said it and even gave details about how they're going to do it. There's no B.S. about "restoring democracy" or "doing it for the people."I never believed the lies from the reason for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and this one even less.
They're being truthful about this one: we're going to steal their oil. They've said it and even gave details about how they're going to do it. There's no B.S. about "restoring democracy" or "doing it for the people."