For the unvaccinated for covid 19. A short question.

[StarSong]

I've never gotten antibiotics to combat viruses - only for bacterial infections like UTIs, strep, ear infections, etc.

 

[spookycat]

I've had bouts of Candida before that are supposed to be treated with antifungals, however if I had a scrip for antibiotics for something else, it would wipe out the Candida better. Sometimes I think there's things they aren't telling us.

 

[MACKTEXAS]

I've had bouts of Candida before that are supposed to be treated with antifungals, however if I had a scrip for antibiotics for something else, it would wipe out the Candida better. Sometimes I think there's things they aren't telling us.

I gave your post a "like", but I found your experience very different from mine. Anytime I've had to take an extended round of antibiotics, that's when I got Candida, then have to apply antifungal (Nystatin). Maybe some of us have varied reactions.

 

[January]

Maye you're thinking of Penicillin. My family doctor always prescribed Erythromycin for viruses. It always worked and I still use it for that if necessary.

No I am not thinking of penicillin - that is an antibiotic, not an anti viral

Antibiotics are for bacterial infections, not viral ones.

 

[Ted01]

Maye you're thinking of Penicillin. My family doctor always prescribed Erythromycin for viruses. It always worked and I still use it for that if necessary.

When I was young, many times my doctors did the same thing... it's rarely done these days for whatever reasons... perhaps silly (to me anyway) ...
Long time ago, many doctors would prescribe antibiotics when dealing with viral infections because viral infections are often accompanied by secondary bacterial ones. They always helped me back then... but these days, docs treat me like I'm uninformed/mistaken...at best?? idk

 

[January]

It's rarely done these days because we are aware of the repercussions of over prescribing antibiotics and creating antibiotic resistance.

However if one has a secondary bacterial infection, then it would be appropriate to do so.

 

[Cora-123]

I think as long as it does not affect society or others, it depends on personal wishes. We are all adults, and we must be responsible for our choices no matter what we make.

 

[Sunny]

The trouble is, unless you are a hermit living alone on a desert island, your decision to be vaccinated (or not) against a deadly disease can potentially affect everyone with whom you come in contact.

 

[StarSong]

The trouble is, unless you are a hermit living alone on a desert island, your decision to be vaccinated (or not) against a deadly disease can potentially affect everyone with whom you come in contact.

In some cases, yes. Less so for Covid now, it seems. I get vacc'd to prevent more serious levels of illness should I contract Covid. Like the pneumonia, flu and shingles vaccines, these are more about self protection.

 

[Teacher Terry]

I took three Covid vaccines and I was very grateful to be able to get it early on because I have asthma and it was really hitting people’s respiratory systems. I had a good friend die a few months before the vaccine became available.

Now, luckily, Covid has migrated to be weaker and it’s also not hitting people‘s respiratory systems. Still I read 350 people a week in the United States die from Covid. I no longer feel the need to get a Covid vaccine because it’s so much milder and I never get a flu shot either.

 

[John cycling]

Fortunately for me and the people around me, I didn't get jabbed with the toxic contagious clot shots that continue
to kill millions of people, so all I can spread to others are good things, like truth, freedom, and being a good example.

 

[Warrigal]

I've never gotten antibiotics to combat viruses - only for bacterial infections like UTIs, strep, ear infections, etc.

Exactly.

For less dangerous viral diseases antibiotics are a waste of money. For potentially fatal diseases we need antivirals designed to kill the viruses. I'm not sure but I think it is possible that a different antiviral might be needed for different viruses. Vaccination is the first line of defence for deadly viruses.

Antibiotics should be used sparingly to prevent bacteria adapting and mutating.

 

[January]

. I'm not sure but I think it is possible that a different antiviral might be needed for different viruses. Vaccination is the first line of defence for deadly viruses.

Antibiotics should be used sparingly to prevent bacteria adapting and mutating.

Correct on all counts.

 

[squatting dog]

Fortunately for me and the people around me, I didn't get jabbed with the toxic contagious clot shots that continue
to kill millions of people, so all I can spread to others are good things, like truth, freedom, and being a good example.

 

[Tazx]

International Journal of Preventative Medicine landmark study completed...

Here are the highlights;

• A new study analyzing 85 million people confirms COVID-19 vaccines are linked to staggering increases in cardiovascular injuries, including heart attacks (+286%), strokes (+240%), and arrhythmia (+199%).
• Pfizer’s mRNA shot shows a 284% increased risk of heart attack after the second dose, while AstraZeneca’s viral vector vaccine carries a 711% higher risk of arrhythmia.
• Epidemiologists warn the true death toll from these injections may exceed 600,000 in the U.S. alone—surpassing casualties from World War I, World War II, and Vietnam combined.
• Public health agencies continue to ignore the mounting evidence, leaving millions at risk of permanent disability or sudden death.
• Coronary artery disease (CAD) jumped by 244% post-second dose.
• Arrhythmia risk exploded by 199% after the first dose—but AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1 shot spiked it by 711%.

Then...

Over a million pregnant women in the Czech Republic were analyzed for a study conducted to see if the COVID-19 vaccines lead to unsuccessful births of their babies, and sure enough, the dirty, deadly clot shot jabs may be the culprit for at least one third of the pregnancies turning into miscarriages or still births. What a shame.

This is a catastrophic effect on fertility, and just another confirmation that it’s no conspiracy theory to assume the spike protein prions from the mRNA jabs travel to the womb and the mother’s immune system attacks the foreign virus-mimicking particles and ends up killing the baby.

1. Vaccine-Induced Pregnancy Loss – A study in the Czech Republic reportedly found that COVID-19 vaccines caused one-third of pregnancies in vaccinated women (ages 18–39) to end in miscarriages or stillbirths (200,000+ fetal deaths from 2021–2023), suggesting spike proteins or nanoparticles may trigger the mother’s immune system to attack the fetus.

This is but a sliver of what you can find in less than 5 min if you look for it.

Then, there is endless countries with massive excess death rates and having to explain to its citizens why...A simple search shows all the major vaccinated countries have the highest death rates of young people, highest sudden death or unexplained deaths, highest cancer rates and turbo cancers and so on.

Now I am not putting this information out to 'prove' a point or to make people angry. Nor do I want nasty responses. I am posting because I am genuinely upset that the people were lied to and given unsafe-tied, untested and ultimately dangerous intervention, that ended up completely useless. I am also upset that people are sick and dying related to this treatment.
I am also mad that they divided the world so drastically and created hatred between us over this. I am angry that the term vaxtard and conspiracy theorist are used so commonly in this world. This whole entire situation since 2020 is ridiculous.

I don't wish harm on anyone, I wish all great health and happiness, and mean no ill will to others despite many arguments with people on here-even some nasty ones!

Sorry once again for 'hitting a nerve again' if I have done so by posting this info, but I feel I have to keep releasing the info as it comes out.

Best day to all!

 

[Teacher Terry]

@Tazx , could you please cite the actual name of the article and the date of the journal, etc. so I can locate it and read it? Thanks so much.

 

[Babs2u]

"A new study?"

 

[Babs2u]

"A new study?"

I was not familiar with predatory journals until I researched your source.

 

[StarSong]

"A new study?"

I read the International Journal of Preventative Medicine study. The above is a mischaracterization of its findings and conclusions.
COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A... : International Journal of Preventive Medicine

I found none of the statistics cited in @Tazx's post above. None. No 711%, 284%, or other supposed statistics. None.

In fact, it states:
"Overall, our study contributes to the existing literature by employing a comprehensive analysis approach and emphasizing controlled observational studies. While acknowledging potential side effects, our findings support the overall safety of the COVID-19 vaccine concerning cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and arrhythmia. However, it is crucial to note that ongoing surveillance and research are essential to continually monitor the safety and efficacy profiles of vaccines, including their potential cardiovascular effects, particularly as new variants emerge and vaccination strategies evolve. This underscores the importance of robust and continuous post-marketing surveillance systems to promptly identify and address any emerging safety concerns associated with vaccines."

I was not familiar with predatory journals until I researched your source.

Indeed. The Czech "study" is sheer nonsense.