And in 2006, Israel 'supported' the election of Hamas because apparently they thought they could control them as they sought to prevent the Palestinian Authority from gaining strength. But all that is in the past (yes I know, it brings us up to the current) and in the years leading up to now, has Israel, the power in the region, done anything to encourage a move towards peace on the Palestinians side. I would argue the answer to that is no.
I looked it up and know that I feel exactly the same way about you.
There’s been almost no mention on American tv about the Palestinian Islamic Jihad who is the other terrorist group supported by Gaza Palestinians and they also took hostages when they breached the border wall along with Hamas.
I'm afraid we won't ever see these hostages again. Is this another way for Hamas to avoid having to admit these hostages died while either being held by them either from either abuse, torture or just downright murdered? Is "being held by another group" a euphemism for being sold into slavery?
Considering the way you've reacted to my past posts I already know that and I am actually honored. Not too much different than the responses you've given to others you don't agree with. It's your problem, not mine.
I’m not aware of reacting to any of your past posts nor do I care about them. And your posts now certainly aren’t worth trying to figure out. As far as you playing the gay card, I didn’t know you were gay until I looked at your profile today. Why don’t you look in the mirror yourself if you can stand to.
What I see is that we have a couple of posters on here who, when their posts are challenged and they have no meaningful response, try to hide behind "personal attack" or something similar. So, I just keep that in mind when I read posts like the one you were responding to.
The baby was real.Al Jazeera posts blurred doll, claims it to be a dead Palestinian baby
Article has also been posted on MSN.com. Just do a search for the article title.
I found the link to the article on Drudge Report. Article posted just today Dec 1st.
Al Jazeera has published on X footage of an emotional man holding a ‘baby’ with a blurred face wrapped in white.
However, social media users quickly shared footage of the ‘baby’ without the blurred edits shared by the News source, revealing it to be only a doll.
“He was born and martyred during the war...a month-and-a-half-old baby was martyred in the hands of his mother, after an Israeli bombing targeted the family home in the Al-Mughraqa area, south of the city,” Al Jazeera wrote alongside the doctored footage.
It is unclear if Al Jazeera had edited the footage themselves in an attempt to deliberately mislead the public or if they had shared the footage without properly researching the background. However, despite numerous people contacting the site about the falsified footage, the X post has remained published.
The X post has garnered over 17,000 views but only reposted 56 times.
While this footage could not be located on Al Jazeera’s Arabic website, other footage was found with adults crying over the death of dolls.
AND IN FURTHER NEWS ...
The OP of this thread cited a report published on "The Grayzone". Identified as an American fringe, far-left news website and blog, founded and edited by American journalist Max Blumenthal. Blumenthal is an American author and blogger and has contributed to Al Jazeera. I'm not saying the thread OP is completely fictitious. I have no idea, as I payed little attention to the post. I don't read fake news websites like The Grayzone as identified by Wikipedia.
I can accept this because when I saw that picture, I absolutely "knew" that was a dead baby. There's a certain "look"... but we're talking about terrorists and we all know by now what they did on 07 Oct. Does anyone *truly* think they wouldn't kill a baby to use as propaganda?! And wouldn't that be naive to believe what they claim since they already slaughtered so many of Israel's babies? I think the question should not be "is that a real baby" but rather "what *happened* to that precious little soul?"
No way I'm going to accept what a terrorist organization says happened!
I agree 100%. But, the truth is the lies about the atrocities committed by Hamas against children has been exaggerated to proportions to elicit outrage. Why use children? To elicit sympathy and outrage and then violence against the monsters that did it. The beheading rumor led a campaign to annihilate every Palestinian. It is the Zionist propaganda machine to have support for the war.
So you choose to believe Hamas and not the Israelis. Israel needs to release every second of the video shot by Hamas on October 7th and people like you should be forced to watch it.
I don't believe any of it. I have seen most all of the horrible atrocities committed on both sides. This war is being fought on social media. No one is winning the "who is the worse group". If anything Israel is losing the PR battle now that they are ridding the south of every living Palestinian.
lol - of course you do. It is clear that you believe whatever Hamas says. Otherwise you would not deny the truth of what Israel says.
I deny the truth of what either side is pushing. But, some people do only believe one side.
As I wrote, Israel needs to release the raw video.
lol - You've kinda worn out that "ad hominem" card. It is not a personal attack when someone points out the fallacies in your posts.
