It's not suicide if you're already going to die and you want to do it where and when, and how you want, and have your family already around you. Who could want anything more? I would have wanted it for my mom. But, no, it had to be a call in the night and by the time I got there, it was too late. I will never get over that.
Whether you're close to death due to terminal disease or you're not, whether it's done with medical assistance or not, ending your own life is suicide.
I'm not arguing that it's wrong. I'm all for it. I just had a question about why there isn't more support for End-of-Life Choice laws.
Personally, I don't need my gov't to say it's ok for me to choose to be euthanized, but I would definitely tick the "Yes" box if End-of-Life Choice legislation appeared on my voter's ballot.
Because mental illness is not an option for assistant suicide, and and neither is being mad at the world.
The thread seems to be veering away from the intent of the law... assisted suicide for the terminally ill. I doubt we will ever see assisted suicide for random depressed people. They will have to resort to the time-honored methods of shuffling off the mortal coil.
Maybe / maybe not...if we can convince the powers that be , that the terminal should have this available. That might just open the door for others, the depressed or ?
It really shouldn't matter why a person wants to die at their own hand. We do not have a choice in coming into this world...we IMO sure as hell should have a choice in leaving it.
Most of us don't want to die, but if it's inevitable, wouldn't we prefer a peaceful, painless end?
If it is inevitable ? There is no if about it. All of us are going to die.
We always have that choice.
True, Traveler. But how about "If it is inevitable in the near future?" Or maybe just stick with the 6 month time frame already suggested.
Well that's true, I just meant in a more dignified manner , & perhaps a bit less messy.
I understand what you're saying, but we're just interested in getting this bill for terminally ill patients passed. The kind of idea you're talking about (which frankly I don't quite understand why there should be a law for it--or maybe you're meaning there should not be a law against it) is just the kind of slippery slope talk that could kill it.
So we stick with the six month time frame?..OK that suits the needs /desires of some...others should still be held to the decision of ?
Why can't we just say...OK, ya want to leave this life, this earth ? Sorry you have come to that decision but....it is your decision too make ..........farewell.
I know a few people, including myself that at one time or another thought their life wasn't worth living and perhaps ending it would be better than sticking around. Based on where we're all at in our lives now, I'd say we're pretty thankful that we didn't carry through with it. I sure as heck know I am. To simply roll out the suicide red carpet for people who feel this way due to some trauma in their lives rather than trying to help them through their problems is negligible.
So at one time you had the thought, and it was fine ? But now you think all others should be 'helped through their problems' ? How is it any of my business to stick my nose into someone else's situation ? You had the thought & changed your mind, so now you're speaking for someone else ?
If someone asked for my help, I would of course provide it...if that same person asked for Kevorkian's phone number ?..I'd provide that as well.
Your entire post is assumptious of what I went through and how I felt, yet you say that I am speaking for someone else? I am speaking for myself and other people I know personally as well as their situations regarding this matter, so yes I can confidently speak for how they feel. If someone who is not terminally ill asked you to assist them in committing suicide and you did, well that speaks more about your character than it does anything else, not too mention it IS criminally negligible. I certainly hope your son, daughter or close friend doesn't run across someone like you when they're down on their luck with their finger on the trigger, they deserve a better chance than that. You appear to be looking for any argument you can find on this issue for whatever reason, I'm not biting. Have a good weekend.
Debbie, you're right of course. You want every second with your husband. Hope this discussion isn't too insensitive but I agree with there being an option for the reasons stated by the Canadian guidelines. Only for those reasons.I have always been a big advocate on this issue, but now that my husband is terminally ill and we’ll be lucky if he’s still with us in 6 months, I couldn’t imagine anything like this. Talk is big until it’s staring you in the face.