It means these are her preferred pronouns. Yes, she identifies as female with no stipulations.no,she looked like judith lol,,,,,whats the she/her on the badge mean?
OH! Her Pronoun! How ridiculous!no,she looked like judith lol,,,,,whats the she/her on the badge mean?
No. I'm not as old as youRemember when girls were girls and men were men?
Yes, it means this ^It means these are her preferred pronouns. Yes, she identifies as female with no stipulations.
Ah, but you're unlikely to forget when men were girls and girls were men.No. I'm not as old as you
Ah, but you're unlikely to forget when men were girls and girls were men.
My viewpoint:I'm seeing these gender identifiers more often these days, like "they/them." It's done out of respect for those whose who don't identify with the traditional male/female genders. I like that society is becoming more inclusive.
I admit it does get confusing keeping up with all the identifiers...LGBTQ and all the "plus" ones. But, it makes no difference to me how people prefer to be addressed. I also agree that stereotypical gender roles are pointless. If a boy wants to play with a doll, or if a girl wants to play with a toy tool kit, they should be allowed to.My viewpoint:
Everybody deserves respect.
If a person needs help, find help for the person.
However, I also believe all of this has gone way too far in terms of trying to pull nearly the entire population into it, and especially little kids. I mean the toys a child likes to play with, etc., has nothing to do with 'gender.' I think the stereotypical 'gender roles' has a lot to do with this problem. and I personally have always thought stereotypical gender roles to be stupid and pointless.
Not necessarily. Let's say you're in a store and a sales person asked if someone was helping you. If another person had been helping you, you'd point to that person and say, "Yes, he/she/they (whatever is appropriate) have been, thanks."I don't get the meaning of that badge. She/her are third person pronouns, which means you would never use them when speaking to Judith anyway. You'd use "you." So, how would she ever know, or why would she care, what you call her when speaking to someone else?
But that throws English grammar off even more.. if someone is he or she, it's 'has,' but they would be 'have.'Not necessarily. Let's say you're in a store and a sales person asked if someone was helping you. If another person had been helping you, you'd point to that person and say, "Yes, he/she/they (whatever is appropriate) have been, thanks."