rgp
Well-known Member
- Location
- Milford,OH
A "hold harmless" agreement protects one of the participants from liability. What I meant by that was just because his victims were gullible and fell for his con does not make him less liable for his actions. Thus, he shouldn't be "held harmless."
I never said he was harmless.
And even though his victims might have been "stupid and greedy" doesn't make him any less a crook. Stupid and greedy are not crimes. Con games are. And HE was greedier than all of them.
Exactly...you tried to say {I} said he was harmless...which I did not.
As for.......
"Stupid and greedy are not crimes. Con games are. And HE was greedier than all of them."
"Con games are."......... Perhaps they shouldn't be ?....what ever happened to buyer beware ?
I am not absolving him from any wrong-doing....But it gets old hearing people saying...essentially , I was stupid & i fell for this or that.....well perhaps don't be so damn stupid. We always seem ready to hold some responsible for their actions....why not the others? If we as a society would stop [in so many incidences] running to the rescue....maybe people would learn?