Who Won't Opt For The Vaccine

Aneeda72 said:
I did NOT say I got the flu from the vaccine. The flu vaccine is 70 percent against the flu.

I said I got the flu shot. Then I got the flu. That means the flu shot i got was not effective and I fell into the 30 percent category of people who can get the flu with a flu shot. Period. I don’t need to “look it up”.
Click to expand...
The nerve! How dare you even hint that a shot or drug didn't work!!! 😂
 
Aneeda72 said:
I did NOT say I got the flu from the vaccine. The flu vaccine is 70 percent against the flu.

I said I got the flu shot. Then I got the flu. That means the flu shot i got was not effective and I fell into the 30 percent category of people who can get the flu with a flu shot. Period. I don’t need to “look it up”.
Click to expand...
I know you didn't say that, Aneeda. I was responding to Win.
 
Two health workers in Britain have suffered anaphylactic shock after receiving the first dose of the vaccine,
Now anyone who suffers from food allergies or has ever experienced an adverse reaction to a medication or vaccine is being advised against having it.
You would think they might have been aware of this before they started vaccinating.
So this advice means I no longer have to think about if I will have it.I can’t have it.
 
Furryanimal said:
Two health workers in Britain have suffered anaphylactic shock after receiving the first dose of the vaccine,
Now anyone who suffers from food allergies or has ever experienced an adverse reaction to a medication or vaccine is being advised against having it.
You would think they might have been aware of this before they started vaccinating.
So this advice means I no longer have to think about if I will have it.I can’t have it.
Click to expand...
This is just the beginning.
Give it 60 days and I'm sure there will be more problems such as, people on certain medications having severe and hopefully not deadly reactions..we are now the Guinea Pigs.
 
Butterfly said:
I doubt "they" will be able to do all that sanctioning practically or legally (social gatherings? churches, pharmacies? How's that gonna work?) What "they" can and doubtlessly will do is require the vaccines for certain kinds of jobs, enrolling kids in school, international travel, etc. Other vaccines are already required for those things anyway, so covid will probably just be added to the list.
Click to expand...
Here's a thought: what if everybody who refuses the vaccine cannot buy food, cannot be employed, cannot get an education?
 
Furryanimal said:
Two health workers in Britain have suffered anaphylactic shock after receiving the first dose of the vaccine,
Now anyone who suffers from food allergies or has ever experienced an adverse reaction to a medication or vaccine is being advised against having it.
You would think they might have been aware of this before they started vaccinating.
So this advice means I no longer have to think about if I will have it.I can’t have it.
Click to expand...
I can’t either 🤦🏻‍♀️
 
Becky1951 said:
This is just the beginning.
Give it 60 days and I'm sure there will be more problems such as, people on certain medications having severe and hopefully not deadly reactions..we are now the Guinea Pigs.
Click to expand...
Yup, I said that on a different thread long ago. Makes sense to get rid of the older non working people first.
 
Sunny said:
Considering how new this virus is, and how deadly, I think our scientific researchers, and particularly Dr. Fauci, have done an incredible job.
Click to expand...
Agreed. And it’s not like he’s making all these decisions himself. He’s the leader/spokesperson for many brilliant scientists. N.A. is very lucky to have these brilliant people who are adapting rapidly to new & changing information.
 
Aneeda72 said:
Wow, should we dig up old King Henry to enforce this? I think not
Click to expand...
Please, my lapse of knowledge regarding Europian politics, but why the reference of old King Henry? I'm simply saying it may be possible that governing forces could restrict unvaccinated people from buying groceries and other types of social gatherings based on the possibility of COVID infection.
 
Mr. Ed said:
Please, my lapse of knowledge regarding Europian politics, but why the reference of old King Henry? I'm simply saying it may be possible that governing forces could restrict unvaccinated people from buying groceries and other types of social gatherings based on the possibility of COVID infection.
Click to expand...
I used King Henry because he was not a member of the American political system, he was an oppressive king, and he married and suppressed woman. No one wants him in charge 😂. Don’t you remember the son and various movies? 😂😂😂😂
 
Mr. Ed said:
Please, my lapse of knowledge regarding Europian politics, but why the reference of old King Henry? I'm simply saying it may be possible that governing forces could restrict unvaccinated people from buying groceries and other types of social gatherings based on the possibility of COVID infection.
Click to expand...
Which is why you still wear a mask
 
Lakeland living said:
A friend sent this to me...
Have a look and share what you think.
https://brandnewtube.com/uploa....d/videos/2020/12/krS

2 0
Click to expand...
I can understand the concern about how fast the vaccine has been developed, how few people it has been tested on, and how short a period of time those receiving the vaccine have been followed for potential side effects. We will each make an individual choice about whether to receive the vaccine. As I have stated before, I have followed the medical literature on the development and testing of the various vaccines (there is no one vaccine, but multiple candidates). I am prepared to take the risk, myself, when a solidly-researched vaccine is approved by the FDA and becomes available for seniors. I am even prepared to be made sick by it for a little while. That is my personal choice, based not on any fear of contracting the disease myself, but from my desire to do my part to help bring an end to the intense suffering of all of humanity due to excess deaths, widespread & devastating mourning, and economic consequences jn the form, for example, of a huge spike in worldwide hunger & starvation. Not to mention the emotional toll on all of us due to isolation and lack of contact with family & friends.

However, as a retired physician, I am appalled to see these other doctors calling COVID-19 "a hoax" and denying the existence of the global pandemic. The term "hoax" implies that there is some group of people that stands to benefit from promulgating disinformation on such a massive scale. In other words, a conspiracy. I just can't see the logic, let alone the feasibility, of such a widespread conspiracy. That's a patently ridiculous idea.

How many people need to die, how many hospitals & nursing homes need to be overwhelmed, how many health professionals need to be dropping from overwork & PTSD, for these doctors to be convinced? This is a very, very tiny minority of physicians worldwide who are spouting this nonsense. I did not see a single one of the doctors in that video admitting to being on the frontlines of dealing with these very ill patients. One of them is only board-certified in psychiatry!

Please don't let the COVID-deniers, no matter what their degrees, influence decisions that affect other human beings. If you choose to wait for more data about the vaccine, or refuse it altogether, that is your choice. But we DO need to all work together through the recommended public health measures to combat this deadly virus. There IS no hoax, no conspiracy of disinformation, about this brutal pandemic, It is REAL.
 

Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top