I'm pretty much on Knight's wave length on this topic. To me, science is not the answer to life's meaning, but it gives us the tools that can be used by a rational mind to edge closer to understanding what's what. Science does not demand that you accept anything, just because some ancient scholar wrote it. It is always subject to questioning, analysis, and sometimes rejection. As we learn more and more, our scientific theories change all the time. I so much prefer that as a guide to understanding life; I am encouraged to use my brain instead of being told what I should believe.
I think in the modern world, the only logical place for religion is in its humanism. If a religion teaches us to be kind, compassionate, peaceful, tolerant, and friendly to other people, kind to animals and to the planet, then it makes sense as a guide. Basing modern life on the Bible, just because somebody scared us into doing it, is not a way to give life "meaning."
OK, children, end of sermon.
I think in the modern world, the only logical place for religion is in its humanism. If a religion teaches us to be kind, compassionate, peaceful, tolerant, and friendly to other people, kind to animals and to the planet, then it makes sense as a guide. Basing modern life on the Bible, just because somebody scared us into doing it, is not a way to give life "meaning."
OK, children, end of sermon.