No, it's not a violent act. It's a stupid act.Asking someone who is standing next to you to wear their mask properly isn’t a violent act. You’re vilifying the victim.
No, it's not a violent act. It's a stupid act.Asking someone who is standing next to you to wear their mask properly isn’t a violent act. You’re vilifying the victim.
Again, you're a gem.That's you're editorializing. The young woman said something and pointed her finger after the older woman said something to her.
If you don't want someone who's not wearing their mask properly near you, why would you start an argument with them that brings them closer to you?
We've all seen the same type of fools on the road who decide that someone is driving in an unsafe manner, so instead of letting them get far away, they confront them & start a road rage incident.
Likewise. And you don't have a valid reply.Again, you're a gem.
The suspect was "Released pending a hearing." No bail? That should be a hint about the outcome.
I see what's there. You are seeing only what you want to see. Even in the narrative at the beginning, the reporter says, "After the victim asked her to wear her mask correctly."
Watch the entire incident & at 1:20, you'll see the older woman start the confrontation by telling the younger woman to wear her mask correctly. Only then does the younger woman walk up to her & probably tell her to mind her own business. She was only assaulted when the older woman raised her cane up.
LOL - "Racist." Feel free to confront anyone you want if you think it's a good idea. After all, free speech is guaranteed by the constitution.I did what you suggested looked at the video @ 1:20
Ahead of the 1:20 I saw the younger woman approach the older woman from the back. Touch the older woman on the back. The older woman turned and stepped back trapped unable to get away from the younger woman.
I'll ask you once you understand what the word confront means. Who initiated the confrontation? Who was hostile?
con·front
1: to face especially in challenge
2: to cause to meet : bring face-to-face
meet (someone) face to face with hostile or argumentative intent.
You almost sound racist by expecting the younger woman to automatically be aggressive because the victim asked her to wear her mask correctly.
I've already done like the older woman did by asking some <---- as in more than one person, not confronting. I hope you understand the difference between asking and confronting. In case you don't. The older woman asked, the younger confronted in a hostile manner. The older woman in an interview stated she asked others & they complied. Why do you think the younger woman would act the way she did?LOL - "Racist." Feel free to confront anyone you want if you think it's a good idea. After all, free speech is guaranteed by the constitution.
Perhaps the get-well cards & flowers will be worth it.
Since there was no sound on the video, you have no idea how the older woman spoke to the younger woman.I've already done like the older woman did by asking some <---- as in more than one person, not confronting. I hope you understand the difference between asking and confronting. In case you don't. The older woman asked, the younger confronted in a hostile manner. The older woman in an interview stated she asked others & they complied. Why do you think the younger woman would act the way she did?
As for cards & flowers it's more likely my wife would get those upon my death caused by someone like the younger woman not wearing a mask properly than asking those that are ignorant to wear theirs properly.
I think were even in agreeing sound would help. No sound but no confrontation by the older woman. But finger wagging and & seeing the younger woman's mouth moving, then confronting the older woman even you could see the difference in demeanor.Since there was no sound on the video, you have no idea how the older woman spoke to the younger woman.
And, the interview with the older woman was one-sided. She wouldn't tell the truth unless it supported her opinion or flattered her.
Yes, people are different. Which is why it's foolish to confront anyone. You know nothing about them & you have no idea how they will react, so you're rolling the dice.I think were even in agreeing sound would help. No sound but no confrontation by the older woman. But finger wagging and & seeing the younger woman's mouth moving, then confronting the older woman even you could see the difference in demeanor.
She may be charged with assault but it's unlikely she'll be convicted. Had the older woman not raised her cane, the younger woman would be convicted - probably of felony assault with bodily injury. Until the older woman did that, it was only a verbal dispute. The older woman escalated the situation by threatening the younger woman with her cane.I think based on the video it's clear who the aggressor was. Also clear who initiated the confrontation. So now it's down to what legal consequences will happen.
Legal has two sides criminal & civil. I don't think the younger woman will get away without with some form of criminal charge or charges. Then I can imagine a personal injury lawyer seeking compensation for injuries & expenses.
What's your opinion win231?
The fact she was even arrested shows that the police think a crime was committed. No bail is a sign of nothing. So long as she's not considered a flight risk there's no need for bail. They know where to find her. You've been wrong on this since the beginning and you continue to double down . I really think you're happy that somebody got hurt over a mask since you're obviously so anti mask. You're a gem.The suspect was "Released pending a hearing." No bail? That should be a hint about the outcome.
I see what's there. You are seeing only what you want to see.Win saw this
Quote
If you watch carefully, the younger woman's mask was below her nose. The older woman not only confronts her but also raises her cane at her. Really stupid - both to confront someone over a mask, then threaten her with her cane (especially considering her health issues) She has a fractured leg & the younger woman probably won't be charged:"
What I saw
I saw the older woman making copies when the younger woman approached her from behind. The only visble confrontation was initiated by the younger woman.
Reasonable to turn around to see who it is. With no audio it's impossible to know what the younger woman was saying. But whatever it was once she turned around the older woman backed up putting distance between her & the younger woman. The younger woman still saying something and shaking her finger at the older woman, the distance between made it possible for the older woman to raise her cane for self defense.
Same video with two different thoughts about what they see.
If I saw someone with their mask not properly positioned I'd have no problem saying something. Unlike Win I don't see evil intent in the rest of America's population.
FastTrax obviously in Win's America we can't all get along.
What was she supposed to do after the younger woman touched her while her back was turned. Visible but no audio the younger was shaking her hand & saying something that caused the older woman to back up and lift her cane. I didn't see the cane actually strike the older woman did you? FYI the covid-19 can kill. Cooties on the other hand are a body louse. Fear of dying from a body louse isn't what the older woman was concerned with.Older woman is afraid of COVID cooties, yet she thinks it's okay to poke the younger woman with her nasty cane. Defending herself?I think not.
Not that I'm defending the assault against the older woman at all, but I have to wonder: if she was that worried about Covid, what was she doing in a Staples? Is making copies worth taking that kind of risk, if she is immuno-compromised?
Just a side issue, but still.
I didn't hear the "verbal request" and neither did you. It could have been a threat followed by a poke with her cane, which is an assault.A verbal request to wear a mask properly
Thank you. I know I'm a gem. And, if you think I'm happy that somebody got hurt over a mask, you're not much of a thinker.The fact she was even arrested shows that the police think a crime was committed. No bail is a sign of nothing. So long as she's not considered a flight risk there's no need for bail. They know where to find her. You've been wrong on this since the beginning and you continue to double down . I really think you're happy that somebody got hurt over a mask since you're obviously so anti mask. You're a gem.