Shouldn't this be in the recipe forum?small ***** nut cake?
I can see some logic in that, and some problems also.I was not the sharpest tool in the shed in school when it comes to U.S. Government voting procedures. At the risk of sounding uninformed / ignorant why don't we have nationwide / statewide special elections for some of the more serious issues that pop up. Such as abortion, the death penalty and firearm regulations. The people we elect and pay to do this for us do not have a clue as to what there constituents want. They seem to have their own agendas $$$$$$$. Let the people vote on these issues and see what the majority in the country wants. Maybe some of the more informed here can set me straight on this.
"Plan" to use it & "Prepared" to use it are almost the same thing. The quote about not pulling a gun unless you're planning to use it applies to some individuals pulling a gun only as a bluff & never being prepared to use it.I have always heard that you should not pull a gun unless you planned to use it. The gun itself is likely to draw fire. I know all situations are different, what are your thought on that?
I'd think not, but I do like some "nut cakes".
And THIS thread is about firearms regulations In Canada, Or did that fact go over your head ? JimB.The right to bare arms is written into the US Constitution:
Right to keep and bear arms in the United States - Wikipedia
FriendlyI am confused. Is this a friendly tweak across the border, or a pointed comment suggesting we Canadians lack common sense?
All but a few states require gun registration in the USA, as well. Also background checks, and successful completion of a safety class, and successful completion of a safety and ownership responsibility class, and a license to carry and/or conceal, and all of them prohibit certain types of guns, too. Like, you can't own a M142 HIMARS, for exampleOh! O.K.
If yer attempting to be funnyRobin Williams take on Canada living over the United States...
Are you saying that US problems are due to population density?Australia United States
Population: 25,739,000 331,894,000
May the Force be with him.Trudeau is certainly keeping Canada safe from StarWars blasters.
https://7news.com.au/news/crime/sta...ng-to-promote-struggling-restaurant-c-1022839
Don't know about Canada but in Australia heirloom guns that would otherwise be illegal can be kept if rendered inoperable. Probably OK to pass on a gun provided a new registration is legal but not just handed over without some paperwork."Details: The ban will bar anyone from buying, selling or transferring handguns within Canada, and it will stop people from bringing new handguns into the country."
Eventually a gun owner dies. What happens to the gun? Can it be transferred to his heirs or does the government confiscate it? This could be an eventual disarming of the populace in slow motion.
As far as I know, ARA stands for American Restaurant AssociationThe ARA keeps filling American's head with LIES about what the laws are in Canada. Do your own research, and find out the truth. JimB,
Yeah, this thread topic seems to always breed less than cordial remarksTo be fair, some Americans are playing close to the edge. There have been some very mocking comments made re Canadians, and Australians
You're right but I don't see why it should.Yeah, this thread topic seems to always breed less than cordial remarks
It usually starts with "My country's better'n yours," or "You people are nuts."You're right but I don't see why it should.
In the end I think we all want the same thing, a safe place to live and as much freedom to do what we want as possible. If we could keep this discussion to those issues we'd be ok, and probably learn a few things from each other.
Canada has no intention of disarming the populace. Before the ban, 95 percent of gun owning homes had long guns, only 12 percent of populace owned handguns. Again, we have different views than some Americans. Sadly, misconceptions continue to proliferate."Details: The ban will bar anyone from buying, selling or transferring handguns within Canada, and it will stop people from bringing new handguns into the country."
Eventually a gun owner dies. What happens to the gun? Can it be transferred to his heirs or does the government confiscate it? This could be an eventual disarming of the populace in slow motion.